383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14512604)
21. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
König A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Drugs in crops (continued).
Phillips GC
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):655-6. PubMed ID: 15175676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. GM crops in the cross hairs.
Ferber D
Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5445):1662-6. PubMed ID: 10610557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.
Stokstad E
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biotech companies must get back to basics to weigh up risks.
Ewbank J
Nature; 1999 Sep; 401(6750):207. PubMed ID: 10499565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. GM crops and the pesticide paradigm.
Welsh R; Hubbell B; Ervin DE; Jahn M
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):548-9. PubMed ID: 12042850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. US sends mixed message in GM debate...as questions emerge over cost-effectiveness.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6742):298. PubMed ID: 10432097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Value judgments and risk comparisons. The case of genetically engineered crops.
Thompson PB
Plant Physiol; 2003 May; 132(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 12746505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
Kuzma J
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):165-7. PubMed ID: 26961641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Pharming in crop commodities.
Stewart CN
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1222-3. PubMed ID: 18997756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Wilson A; Latham J; Steinbrecher R
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops.
Smyth S; Khachatourians GG; Phillips PW
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 12042844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Are Bt crops safe?
Mendelsohn M; Kough J; Vaituzis Z; Matthews K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12949561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. War on weeds loses ground.
Thompson H
Nature; 2012 May; 485(7399):430. PubMed ID: 22622548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. CGIAR under pressure to support seed treaty.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Feb; 20(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11821839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
