These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1451361)
41. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate. Cohen SA Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Roe v. Wade. Into the next millennium. Sanger AC Conscience; 1998; 18(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 12178889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The abortion issue in the US. Fabrizio T Nord Med; 1990; 105(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 2320407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Intents to delegitimatize the right to abortion in Puerto Rico]. Colón-Warren AE; Dávila AL; Fernós MD; Vicente E P R Health Sci J; 1998 Sep; 17(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 9883472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Abortion and moral consensus: beyond Solomon's choice. Kolbenschlag M Christ Century; 1985 Feb; 102(6):179-83. PubMed ID: 11653713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment. Westfall D Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Abortion update. Address to National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Meeting, November 11, 1989, Baltimore, Maryland. Rogers EH Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1990; 26(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 2092859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions. Orentlicher D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Two steps back: Poland's new abortion law. Nowicka W Plan Parent Eur; 1993 Jun; 22(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 12287103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Abortion: the right to an argument. Meilaender G Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):13-6. PubMed ID: 2606652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument. Trotter G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):51-2. PubMed ID: 21161845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Measuring public attitudes on abortion: methodological and substantive considerations. Cook EA; Jelen TG; Wilcox C Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(3):118-21, 145. PubMed ID: 8354376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [The women and the right to contraceptives]. Charchafche H; Nilsson PM Sven Med Tidskr; 2007; 11(1):139-50. PubMed ID: 18548951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]