BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14514225)

  • 1. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation.
    McGuire MK; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14514225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
    McGuire MK; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
    Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
    J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
    Alkan EA; Parlar A
    J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation.
    Carnio J; Camargo PM; Kenney EB; Schenk RK
    J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1534-43. PubMed ID: 12546106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
    Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periodontal regeneration with a combination of enamel matrix proteins and autogenous bone grafting.
    Cochran DL; Jones A; Heijl L; Mellonig JT; Schoolfield J; King GN
    J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1269-81. PubMed ID: 14584859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enamel matrix derivative (emdogain) or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a pilot study.
    Alkan EA; Parlar A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 23998158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
    Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
    J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Split-mouth evaluation of connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of isolated gingival recession defects in dogs.
    Shirakata Y; Nakamura T; Shinohara Y; Nakamura-Hasegawa K; Hashiguchi C; Takeuchi N; Imafuji T; Sculean A; Noguchi K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3339-3349. PubMed ID: 30506228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
    Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial.
    Roman A; Soancă A; Kasaj A; Stratul SI
    J Periodontal Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 23317049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified coronally advanced flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions.
    Carvalho PF; da Silva RC; Cury PR; Joly JC
    J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1901-6. PubMed ID: 17076617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Connective tissue-bone onlay graft with enamel matrix derivative for treatment of gingival recession: a case report.
    Nozawa T; Sugiyama T; Satoh T; Tanaka K; Enomoto H; Ito K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12516827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
    Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
    Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
    J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
    Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
    J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
    Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes.
    Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 24117676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.