BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1451459)

  • 1. Monitoring of skin response to sodium lauryl sulphate: clinical scores versus bioengineering methods.
    van Neste D; de Brouwer B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Sep; 27(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 1451459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?
    Aramaki J; Effendy I; Happle R; Kawana S; Löffler C; Löffler H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Nov; 45(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11722488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between 2 test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin.
    Held E; Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 10344481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
    Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
    Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical site differences of sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation: randomized controlled trial.
    Leskur D; Bukić J; Petrić A; Zekan L; Rušić D; Šešelja Perišin A; Petrić I; Stipić M; Puizina-Ivić N; Modun D
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Jul; 181(1):175-185. PubMed ID: 30637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin.
    Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1935039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types.
    Fluhr JW; Kuss O; Diepgen T; Lazzerini S; Pelosi A; Gloor M; Berardesca E
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):696-703. PubMed ID: 11736891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H
    Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of body mass index on skin susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Löffler H; Aramaki JU; Effendy I
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12005116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skin irritation in man: a comparative bioengineering study using improved reflectance spectroscopy.
    Andersen PH; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Nov; 33(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 8565486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical impedance compared with other non-invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection of irritation in human skin.
    Ollmar S; Nyrén M; Nicander I; Emtestam L
    Br J Dermatol; 1994 Jan; 130(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8305313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate: benefits and drawbacks in research and practice].
    Löffler H; Effendy I; Happle R
    Hautarzt; 1999 Nov; 50(11):769-78. PubMed ID: 10591786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Studies of cutaneous blood flow of normal forearm skin and irritated forearm skin based on high-resolution laser Doppler perfusion imaging (HR-LDPI).
    Fullerton A; Rode B; Serup J
    Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12005118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: an in vivo study.
    Branco N; Lee I; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):278-84. PubMed ID: 16283906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
    Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man.
    Lee JY; Effendy I; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jun; 36(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 9237006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.