153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1451463)
1. Evaluation of skin irritancy of sodium lauryl sulphate: a comparative study between the replica method and visual evaluation.
Kawai K; Nakagawa M; Kawai J; Kawai K
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Sep; 27(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 1451463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of human skin irritation by carboxylic acids, alcohols, esters and aldehydes, with nitrocellulose-replica method and closed patch testing.
Sato A; Obata K; Ikeda Y; Ohkoshi K; Okumura H; Ozawa N; Ogawa T; Katsumura Y; Kawai J; Tatsumi H; Honoki S; Hiramatsu I; Hiroyama H; Okada T; Kozuka T
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jan; 34(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8789218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulfate is associated with increased positive patch test reactions.
Schwitulla J; Brasch J; Löffler H; Schnuch A; Geier J; Uter W
Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 24593017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human scalp irritation compared to that of the arm and back.
Zhai H; Fautz R; Fuchs A; Bhandarkar S; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Oct; 51(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15500669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests.
Tupker RA; Bunte EE; Fidler V; Wiechers JW; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jun; 40(6):316-22. PubMed ID: 10385334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of skin irritancy by 2 short tests compared to acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulfate.
Hinnen U; Elsner P; Burg G
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Oct; 33(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 8654073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sodium lauryl sulphate penetration in an in vitro model using human skin.
Fullerton A; Broby-Johansen U; Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Apr; 30(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8033548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?
Aramaki J; Effendy I; Happle R; Kawana S; Löffler C; Löffler H
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Nov; 45(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11722488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
Lee CH; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate: benefits and drawbacks in research and practice].
Löffler H; Effendy I; Happle R
Hautarzt; 1999 Nov; 50(11):769-78. PubMed ID: 10591786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time.
Aramaki J; Löffler C; Kawana S; Effendy I; Happle R; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 11736892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of body mass index on skin susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulphate.
Löffler H; Aramaki JU; Effendy I
Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12005116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metallothionein I and II gene knock-out mice exhibit reduced tolerance to 24-h sodium lauryl sulphate patch testing.
Ma C; Li LF; Zhang BX
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 32(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 17362230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
