208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14515640)
1. [Potentialities of low-field magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnosis and treatment of invasive cancer of cervix uteri].
Shatov AV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2003; (3):48-53. PubMed ID: 14515640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carcinoma of the cervix (a pilot study).
Soeters RP; Beningfield SJ; Dehaeck K; Levin W; Bloch B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2015918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cancer of the cervix uteri].
Tarachkova EV; Strel'tsova ON; Panov VO; Bazaeva IY; Tyurin IE
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2015; (6):43-55. PubMed ID: 26999934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma -- review].
Hauth EA; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16673246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.
Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The application of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Petric A; Stojanov D; Lilic V; Filipovic S; Bosnjakovic P; Zivadinovic R; Lilic G; Todorovska I; Vrbic S; Pejcic I
J BUON; 2011; 16(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 22006756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
Lemke U; Hamm B
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervix carcinoma: staging, therapy, after-care. Experiences with magnetic resonance tomography of cervix carcinoma based on recent literature 1993 to 1997].
Oellinger JJ; Michniewicz K; Blohmer JU; Hosten N; Siewert C; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1998; 120(8):373-85. PubMed ID: 9757544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the proximal extension of early stage cervical cancer to the internal os.
Bipat S; van den Berg RA; van der Velden J; Stoker J; Spijkerboer AM
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19576711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of radiotherapeutic effect on uterine cervical cancer].
Iizuka Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jan; 48(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8576620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer.
Sanjuán A; Escaramís G; Ayuso JR; Román SM; Torné A; Ordi J; Lejárcegui JA; Pahisa J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Dec; 278(6):535-9. PubMed ID: 18368415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging in uterine cervical cancer after radiotherapy.
Egashira K; Nakamura K; Terashima H; Nakata H; Kashimura M
Radiat Med; 1992; 10(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 1509103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of uterine cervical cancer].
Matsubara M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 45(10):1115-22. PubMed ID: 8245590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
