These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1451601)
1. Swine chromosomal DNA quantification by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation. Schmitz A; Chaput B; Fouchet P; Guilly MN; Frelat G; Vaiman M Cytometry; 1992; 13(7):703-10. PubMed ID: 1451601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate characterization of porcine bivariate flow karyotype by PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Yerle M; Schmitz A; Milan D; Chaput B; Monteagudo L; Vaiman M; Frelat G; Gellin J Genomics; 1993 Apr; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 8486390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of pig chromosomes in pig-mouse somatic cell hybrid bivariate flow karyotypes. Bouvet A; Konfortov BA; Miller NG; Brown D; Tucker EM Cytometry; 1993; 14(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 7685678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of the DNA content of structurally abnormal X chromosomes and X chromosome aneuploidy using high resolution bivariate flow karyotyping. Trask B; van den Engh G; Nussbaum R; Schwartz C; Gray J Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 2106419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Swine chromosomes: flow sorting and spot blot hybridization. Grunwald D; Geffrotin C; Chardon P; Frelat G; Vaiman M Cytometry; 1986 Nov; 7(6):582-8. PubMed ID: 3536361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Centromeric index versus DNA content flow karyotypes of human chromosomes measured by means of slit-scan flow cytometry. Lucas JN; Gray JW Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 3595351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bivariate flow karyotyping of human chromosomes: evaluation of variation in Hoechst 33258 fluorescence, chromomycin A3 fluorescence, and relative chromosomal DNA content. Boschman GA; Rens W; van Oven CH; Manders EM; Aten JA Cytometry; 1991; 12(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 1722448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bivariate flow karyotyping, sorting, and peak assignment of all rat chromosomes. Shepel LA; Morrissey LW; Hsu LC; Gould MN Genomics; 1994 Jan; 19(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 8188245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semi-automated detection of aberrant chromosomes in bivariate flow karyotypes. Boschman GA; Manders EM; Rens W; Slater R; Aten JA Cytometry; 1992; 13(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 1633726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preparative dual-beam sorting of the human Y chromosome and in situ hybridization of cloned DNA probes. Cremer C; Rappold G; Gray JW; Müller CR; Ropers HH Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 6549159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow cytometric detection of chromosome abnormalities by measuring centromeric index, DNA content, and DNA base composition. Rens W; Boschman GA; Hoovers JM; Manders EM; Slater RM; Stap J; Aten JA Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 May; 6(4):359-75. PubMed ID: 8060891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pig standard bivariate flow karyotype and peak assignment for chromosomes X, Y, 3, and 7. Schmitz A; Chardon P; Gainche I; Chaput B; Guilly MN; Frelat G; Vaiman M Genomics; 1992 Oct; 14(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 1427852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slit-scanning technique using standard cell sorter instruments for analyzing and sorting nonacrocentric human chromosomes, including small ones. Rens W; Van Oven CH; Stap J; Jakobs ME; Aten JA Cytometry; 1994 May; 16(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 8033738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of bivariate flow karyotypes. Dean PN; Kolla S; Van Dilla MA Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 2469555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A PCR-based method to amplify DNA with random primers: determining the chromosomal content of porcine flow-karyotype peaks by chromosome painting. Milan D; Yerle M; Schmitz A; Chaput B; Vaiman M; Frelat G; Gellin J Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1993; 62(2-3):139-41. PubMed ID: 8428513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preparation and bivariate analysis of suspensions of human chromosomes. van den Engh GJ; Trask BJ; Gray JW; Langlois RG; Yu LC Cytometry; 1985 Mar; 6(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 2579781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical usefulness of chromosome analysis by flow cytometry. McConnell TS; Cram LS; Baczek N; Fawcett JJ; Luedemann M; Bartholdi MF Semin Diagn Pathol; 1989 Feb; 6(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 2645627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chromatid contamination can impair the purity of flow-sorted metaphase chromosomes. Telenius H; de Vos D; Blennow E; Willat LR; Ponder BA; Carter NP Cytometry; 1993; 14(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 8432210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]