These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14516213)

  • 1. Evaluation of six multinomial models of conscious and unconscious processes with the recall-recognition paradigm.
    Bellezza FS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):779-96. PubMed ID: 14516213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stochastic relations between conscious and automatic memory processes: an expansion of the process-dissociation procedure].
    Krüger T; Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(2):220-45. PubMed ID: 9487779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.
    Malmberg KJ; Holden JE; Shiffren RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 14979807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory.
    Stahl C; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):570-86. PubMed ID: 18444757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.
    Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Process-dissociation procedure: a testable model for considering assumptions about the stochastic relation between consciously controlled and automatic processes.
    Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B; Krüger T; Bredenkamp J
    Exp Psychol; 2002; 49(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 11975147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unconscious perception: attention, awareness, and control.
    Debner JA; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):304-17. PubMed ID: 8151275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directed forgetting in incidental learning and recognition testing: support for a two-factor account.
    Sahakyan L; Delaney PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 16060780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hierarchical process-dissociation model.
    Rouder JN; Lu J; Morey RD; Sun D; Speckman PL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):370-89. PubMed ID: 18473664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure to recall.
    Laming D
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):157-86. PubMed ID: 19159152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Slip technique, process dissociation model and multinomial modeling: new tools for experimental detection of "Freudian slips"].
    Bröder A; Bredenkamp J
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 9005024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical.
    Thorn AS; Frankish CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 16060776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of complexes on implicit learning.
    Shin YW; Lee JS; Han OS; Rhi BY
    J Anal Psychol; 2005 Apr; 50(2):175-90; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 15817040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inattentional blindness for ignored words: comparison of explicit and implicit memory tasks.
    Butler BC; Klein R
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 19328012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination.
    DeCarlo LT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):767-78. PubMed ID: 14516212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.
    Estes WK; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1003-18. PubMed ID: 12450328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation.
    Jang Y; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):112-27. PubMed ID: 18194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calling all codes: interactive effects of semantics, phonology, and orthography produce dissociations in a repetition blindness paradigm.
    Stolz JA; Neely JH
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(1):105-28. PubMed ID: 18437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.