These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14516222)

  • 1. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the importance of letter pairs in reading-parafoveal processing is not the only view: reply to Inhoff, Radach, Eiter, and Skelly (2003).
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM; Patching GR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):900-3. PubMed ID: 14516223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM; Patching GR; Scott-Brown KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):883-93. PubMed ID: 14516221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):923-41. PubMed ID: 15462631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
    Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading.
    Roy-Charland A; Saint-Aubin J; Lawrence MA; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19801615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parafoveal processing in word recognition.
    Kennedy A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 10881613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.