These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14516225)

  • 1. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.
    Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.
    von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferences from memory: strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared.
    Persson M; Rieskamp J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18986638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Models of quantitative estimations: rule-based and exemplar-based processes compared.
    von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):867-89. PubMed ID: 19586258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Categorization and memory retrieval by three-month-olds.
    Hayne H; Rovee-Collier C; Perris EE
    Child Dev; 1987 Jun; 58(3):750-67. PubMed ID: 3608647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
    Smith JD; Minda JP; Washburn DA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):398-414. PubMed ID: 15355146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback.
    Rhodes MG; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 17352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Category induction in autism: slower, perhaps different, but certainly possible.
    Soulières I; Mottron L; Giguère G; Larochelle S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):311-27. PubMed ID: 20623440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models.
    Sieck WR; Yates JF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1003-21. PubMed ID: 11486916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of feedback in multiple-cue probability learning.
    Newell BR; Weston NJ; Tunney RJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):890-908. PubMed ID: 18932062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.