These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14517360)

  • 21. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits.
    Buch LH; Kargo M; Berg P; Lassen J; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2012 Jun; 6(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 22558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impacts of QTL x environment interactions on genetic response to marker-assisted selection.
    Liu PY; Zhu J; Yan L
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 16450589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Controlling the Overfitting of Heritability in Genomic Selection through Cross Validation.
    Jia Z
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13678. PubMed ID: 29057969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of inaccurate parameter estimates on genetic response to marker-assisted selection in an outbred population.
    Spelman RJ; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3399-410. PubMed ID: 9436122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genotype by Yield*Trait (GYT) Biplot: a Novel Approach for Genotype Selection based on Multiple Traits.
    Yan W; Frégeau-Reid J
    Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):8242. PubMed ID: 29844453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
    Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
    Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The effectiveness of selection for the DNA markers of quantitative trait loci in maize populations].
    Domeniuk VP; Bielousov AO; Syvolap IuM
    Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 15098447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genome-Wide Association and Regional Heritability Mapping of Plant Architecture, Lodging and Productivity in
    Resende RT; de Resende MDV; Azevedo CF; Fonseca E Silva F; Melo LC; Pereira HS; Souza TLPO; Valdisser PAMR; Brondani C; Vianello RP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(8):2841-2854. PubMed ID: 29967054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector.
    Van Eenennaam AL; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 21262975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative trait loci influencing forking defects in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine.
    Xiong JS; McKeand SE; Isik F; Wegrzyn J; Neale DB; Zeng ZB; da Costa E Silva L; Whetten RW
    BMC Genet; 2016 Oct; 17(1):138. PubMed ID: 27756221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genome wide selection in Citrus breeding.
    Gois IB; Borém A; Cristofani-Yaly M; de Resende MD; Azevedo CF; Bastianel M; Novelli VM; Machado MA
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Oct; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27813590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-trait multi-environment models in the genetic selection of segregating soybean progeny.
    Volpato L; Alves RS; Teodoro PE; Vilela de Resende MD; Nascimento M; Nascimento ACC; Ludke WH; Lopes da Silva F; Borém A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215315. PubMed ID: 30998705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Possible uses of genetic markers for improving fertility and health in swine production].
    Steinheuer R; Drögemüller C; Hamann H; Distl O
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jun; 110(6):255-65. PubMed ID: 12866259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance.
    Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):331-41. PubMed ID: 18076470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Simple Test Identifies Selection on Complex Traits.
    Beissinger T; Kruppa J; Cavero D; Ha NT; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):321-333. PubMed ID: 29545467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.