These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14517778)

  • 1. Senate amendment aims to hike NIH funding.
    Rustgi AK
    Gastroenterology; 2003 Oct; 125(4):1007. PubMed ID: 14517778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Senate approves NIH funding amendment to 2009 proposed budget.
    Lang L
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1821. PubMed ID: 18474245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. House approves NIH funding, "de-funds" two NIMH grants.
    Physiologist; 2004 Oct; 47(5):382. PubMed ID: 15587608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in Congress cloud prospects for funding.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2010 May; 465(7297):404-5. PubMed ID: 20505700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomedical agency feels the pinch--again.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):130. PubMed ID: 17262926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ruling may free NIH to fund stem cells studies.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1999 Jan; 283(5401):465, 467. PubMed ID: 9988645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US science agencies set to win big in budget deal.
    Morello L; Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7698):572. PubMed ID: 29595772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embryo research barred from federal funds.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6564):386. PubMed ID: 8559232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength through diversity.
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7019):785. PubMed ID: 15602507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responding to stimuli.
    Mahapatra A
    ACS Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 4(4):233. PubMed ID: 19371128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cuts loom for US science.
    Semeniuk I; Thompson H
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US stimulus bill provides $10 billion boost to NIH.
    Lancet Neurol; 2009 Apr; 8(4):301. PubMed ID: 19296916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Election 2002 update: the fallout for NIH appropriations.
    Olds JL
    Anat Rec B New Anat; 2003 Jan; 270(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12526060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. It is time to update US biomedical funding.
    Grinnell F
    Nature; 2013 Sep; 501(7466):137. PubMed ID: 24025803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Congress Passes 2006 NIH Reform Act.
    Lang L
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Feb; 132(2):474-5. PubMed ID: 17261310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6221):466-7. PubMed ID: 25635067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Science gets little love in Trump spending plan.
    Science News Staff
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):795. PubMed ID: 28546167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific Drought, Golden Eggs, and Global Leadership - Why Trump's NIH Funding Cuts Would Be a Disaster.
    Katz IT; Wright AA
    N Engl J Med; 2017 May; 376(18):1701-1704. PubMed ID: 28402240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.