BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14518150)

  • 1. [The real value of the impact factors].
    Puche RC
    Medicina (B Aires); 2003; 63(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 14518150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
    Törnqvist TE
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
    Colquhoun D
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the impact factor.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modellers seek reason for low retraction rates.
    Butler D; Hogan J
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):236-7. PubMed ID: 17507938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools.
    Döring TF
    Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7129):709. PubMed ID: 17301769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The misused impact factor.
    Simons K
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ratings and rankings: judging the evaluation of quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(5):215-6. PubMed ID: 16226562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact factor rises again.
    Dunnett SB
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Dec; 64(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 15561462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of impact factors.
    Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):173. PubMed ID: 11809301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On judgment, impact factor and feelings: what can we learn from the impact factor?
    Fatović-Ferencić S
    Croat Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(3):344-5. PubMed ID: 15190920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A socratic dialogue on impact factors.
    Goldsmith LA; Hall RP
    J Invest Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):1923-4. PubMed ID: 16912683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What weight does impact factor carry?
    Aase S
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.
    Scully C
    Community Dent Health; 2007 Sep; 24(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 17958071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [We wish more professional debate about the bibliometric research indicators].
    Søndergaard J; Mouritzen PE; Olesen SP; Molin S; Fink H; Blaabjerg F; Sivertsen G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Mar; 172(12):984; author reply 984. PubMed ID: 20376986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.