These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14518792)

  • 1. A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users.
    Qian H; Loizou PC; Dorman MF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 14518792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
    Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits from a mobile telephone adapter in Combi40+ cochlear implant users.
    Castro A; Lassaletta L; Bastarrica M; Perez-Mora R; Josefa De Sarria M; Gavilan J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 18568501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants.
    Adams JS; Hasenstab MS; Pippin GW; Sismanis A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2004 Feb; 83(2):96, 99-100, 102-3. PubMed ID: 15008443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device.
    Briggs RJ; Eder HC; Seligman PM; Cowan RS; Plant KL; Dalton J; Money DK; Patrick JF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 17898671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial speech bandwidth extension improves telephone speech intelligibility and quality in cochlear implant users.
    Nogueira W; Abel J; Fingscheidt T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1640. PubMed ID: 31067961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solutions to electromagnetic interference problems between cochlear implants and GSM phones.
    Sorri MJ; Piiparinen PJ; Huttunen KH; Haho MJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 16562637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants.
    Ito J; Nakatake M; Fujita S
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Dec; 121(6):802-4. PubMed ID: 10580241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nontraditional 'aids' to hearing: assistive listening devices.
    Rupp RR; Vaughn GR; Lightfoot RK
    Geriatrics; 1984 Mar; 39(3):55-6, 61-7, 71-3. PubMed ID: 6698401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Telecommunication Modality, Internet Transmission Quality, and Accessories on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Mantokoudis G; Koller R; Guignard J; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Senn P
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Apr; 19(4):e135. PubMed ID: 28438727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective assessment of cochlear implant users' signal-to-noise ratio requirements for different levels of wireless device usability.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):952-68. PubMed ID: 25514448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers.
    Horga D; Liker M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):211-7. PubMed ID: 16428239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive?
    Anderson I; Baumgartner WD; Böheim K; Nahler A; Arnoldner C; D'Haese P
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):446-53. PubMed ID: 17005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.