These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14518793)

  • 21. The effects of common footwear on stance-phase mechanical properties of the prosthetic foot-shoe system.
    Major MJ; Scham J; Orendurff M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 28486847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monitoring of posture allocations and activities by a shoe-based wearable sensor.
    Sazonov ES; Fulk G; Hill J; Schutz Y; Browning R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Apr; 58(4):983-90. PubMed ID: 20403783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repeatability of the Pedar-X in-shoe pressure measuring system.
    Ramanathan AK; Kiran P; Arnold GP; Wang W; Abboud RJ
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2010 Jun; 16(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 20483137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multisensor approach to walking distance estimation with foot inertial sensing.
    Alvarez JC; González RC; Alvarez D; López AM; Rodríguez-Uría J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5720-3. PubMed ID: 18003311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vivo tendon force measurement of 2-week duration in sheep.
    Meyer DC; Jacob HA; Nyffeler RW; Gerber C
    J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 14672577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic loading of the plantar aponeurosis in walking.
    Erdemir A; Hamel AJ; Fauth AR; Piazza SJ; Sharkey NA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):546-52. PubMed ID: 14996881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A state-of-the-art review of foot pressure.
    Zulkifli SS; Loh WP
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Jan; 26(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 30600155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In-shoe foot pressure measurement system utilising piezoelectric film transducers.
    Nevill AJ; Pepper MG; Whiting M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 7616786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In-shoe plantar tri-axial stress profiles during maximum-effort cutting maneuvers.
    Cong Y; Lam WK; Cheung JT; Zhang M
    J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3799-806. PubMed ID: 25468303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of plantar loading parameters during gait in terms of reliability, variability, effect of gender and relationship between contact area and plantar pressure.
    Murphy DF; Beynnon BD; Michelson JD; Vacek PM
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Feb; 26(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15737261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New method for assessment of gait variability based on wearable ground reaction force sensor.
    Liu T; Inoue Y; Shibata K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2341-4. PubMed ID: 19163171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of cadence and power output on force application and in-shoe pressure distribution during cycling by competitive and recreational cyclists.
    Sanderson DJ; Hennig EM; Black AH
    J Sports Sci; 2000 Mar; 18(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 10737268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of good and poor walking shoe characteristics on plantar pressure and gait in people with gout.
    Stewart S; Dalbeth N; McNair P; Parmar P; Gow P; Rome K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Dec; 29(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 25304642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gait analysis using floor markers and inertial sensors.
    Do TN; Suh YS
    Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(2):1594-611. PubMed ID: 22438727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study of the relative timing of shear forces on the sole of the forefoot during walking.
    Tappin JW; Robertson KP
    J Biomed Eng; 1991 Jan; 13(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 2002671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of the shoe on plantar foot pressures.
    Nyska M; McCabe C; Linge K; Laing P; Klenerman L
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1995 Feb; 66(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 7863769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Embedded capacitive sensor system for hip surgery rehabilitation: online measurements and long-term stability.
    Salpavaara TJ; Verho JA; Lekkala JO; Halttunen JE
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():935-8. PubMed ID: 19162811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Force platform for rats measures fore and hind forces concurrently.
    Welch JM; Wade JA; Hillberry BM; Weaver CM
    J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2734-8. PubMed ID: 19782366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensor architectural tradeoff for diabetic foot ulcer monitoring.
    Ostadabbas S; Saeed A; Nourani M; Pompeo M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6687-90. PubMed ID: 23367463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Plantar shear stress measurements - A review.
    Rajala S; Lekkala J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 May; 29(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 24820135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.