These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14518863)

  • 21. Application of oligonucleotide probes for the detection of Thiothrix spp. in activated sludge plants treating paper and board mill wastes.
    Kim SB; Goodfellow M; Kelly J; Saddler GS; Ward AC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):559-64. PubMed ID: 12216687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Ramphao M; Wentzel MC; Merritt R; Ekama GA; Young T; Buckley CA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nitrification performance and microbial community dynamics in a submerged membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
    Li H; Yang M; Zhang Y; Yu T; Kamagata Y
    J Biotechnol; 2006 May; 123(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 16310272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process.
    Lee H; Han J; Yun Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Total nitrogen removal in a hybrid, membrane-aerated activated sludge process.
    Downing LS; Nerenberg R
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3697-708. PubMed ID: 18707749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Micromanipulation and further identification of FISH-labelled microcolonies of a dominant denitrifying bacterium in activated sludge.
    Thomsen TR; Nielsen JL; Ramsing NB; Nielsen PH
    Environ Microbiol; 2004 May; 6(5):470-9. PubMed ID: 15049920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microbial community analysis and performance of a phosphate-removing activated sludge.
    Liu Y; Zhang T; Fang HH
    Bioresour Technol; 2005 Jul; 96(11):1205-14. PubMed ID: 15734306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using respirometric techniques and fluorescent in situ hybridization to evaluate the heterotrophic active biomass in activated sludge.
    Ismail A; Wentzel MC; Bux F
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Oct; 98(3):561-8. PubMed ID: 17311354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nitrifying community structures and nitrification performance of full-scale municipal and swine wastewater treatment plants.
    Whang LM; Chien IC; Yuan SL; Wu YJ
    Chemosphere; 2009 Apr; 75(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19246073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anaerobic/oxic/anoxic granular sludge process as an effective nutrient removal process utilizing denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms.
    Kishida N; Kim J; Tsuneda S; Sudo R
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2303-10. PubMed ID: 16766009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterisation of pathogenic bacteria in a UASB-polishing pond system using molecular techniques.
    Godinho VM; Nascimento FM; Silva SQ; von Sperling M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):813-9. PubMed ID: 20150719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stability and reproducibility of low-temperature anaerobic biological wastewater treatment.
    Collins G; Mahony T; O'Flaherty V
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2006 Mar; 55(3):449-58. PubMed ID: 16466384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rate of nitrate production during a two-stage nitrification batch reaction.
    Pratt S; Gapes D; Yuan Z; Keller J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):81-7. PubMed ID: 15656299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of nutrient-removing microbial communities in activated sludge from full-scale MBRs and conventional plants.
    Saunders AM; Larsen P; Nielsen PH
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 23863429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nitrite concentration influences the population structure of Nitrospira-like bacteria.
    Maixner F; Noguera DR; Anneser B; Stoecker K; Wegl G; Wagner M; Daims H
    Environ Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 8(8):1487-95. PubMed ID: 16872410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microbial population dynamics at effluent treatment plants.
    Moharikar A; Purohit HJ; Kumar R
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 15931414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of bioaugmentation on the performance of sequencing batch reactor and sludge characteristics in the treatment process of papermaking wastewater.
    Hailei W; Guosheng L; Ping L; Feng P
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2006 Dec; 29(5-6):283-9. PubMed ID: 16983527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Treatment of dairy effluents in an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor.
    Schwarzenbeck N; Borges JM; Wilderer PA
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Mar; 66(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 15558277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In situ detection of starch-hydrolyzing microorganisms in activated sludge.
    Xia Y; Kong Y; Nielsen PH
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 66(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18754781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of the microbial community in biological processes treating industrial and domestic wastewaters.
    Degenaar AP; Ismail A; Bux F
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 104(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 17922822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.