These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14519405)

  • 1. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges.
    Ammenwerth E; Gräber S; Herrmann G; Bürkle T; König J
    Int J Med Inform; 2003 Sep; 71(2-3):125-35. PubMed ID: 14519405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usability studies on interactive health information systems; where do we stand?
    Peute LW; Spithoven R; Bakker PJ; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():327-32. PubMed ID: 18487752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of health information technology: which questions for which systems? Proposal for a taxonomy.
    Grémy F; Degoulet P
    Med Inform (Lond); 1993; 18(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 8289530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond effectiveness: the evaluation of information systems using A Comprehensive Health Technology Assessment Framework.
    Kazanjian A; Green CJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 11922933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating user interactions with clinical information systems: a model based on human-computer interaction models.
    Despont-Gros C; Mueller H; Lovis C
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 15896698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation: salvation or nemesis of medical informatics?
    Moehr JR
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):113-25. PubMed ID: 11922929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework.
    Shaw NT
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 11922936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining a framework for health information technology evaluation.
    Eisenstein EL; Juzwishin D; Kushniruk AW; Nahm M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 164():94-9. PubMed ID: 21335694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The TEAM methodology for the evaluation of information systems in biomedicine.
    Grant A; Plante I; Leblanc F
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 11922935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User acceptance of clinical information systems: a methodological approach to identify the key dimensions allowing a reliable evaluation framework.
    Despont-Gros C; Fabry P; Muller H; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1038-42. PubMed ID: 15360970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Health Information Technology -where are we heading?].
    Ash N; Levy I
    Harefuah; 2013 May; 152(5):254-6, 310. PubMed ID: 23885446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E-health interventions as complex interventions: improving the quality of methods of assessment.
    Holbrook AM; Thabane L; Shcherbatykh IY; O'Reilly D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():952. PubMed ID: 17238571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation fidelity: a framework for evaluation in the health information technology field.
    Eisenstein EL; Lobach DF; Montgomery P; Kawamoto K; Anstrom KJ
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():949. PubMed ID: 18694049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating heuristic evaluation with cognitive walkthrough: development of a hybrid usability inspection method.
    Kushniruk AW; Monkman H; Tuden D; Bellwood P; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():221-5. PubMed ID: 25676977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation studies for the evaluation of health information technologies: experiences and results.
    Ammenwerth E; Hackl WO; Binzer K; Christoffersen TE; Jensen S; Lawton K; Skjoet P; Nohr C
    Health Inf Manag; 2012; 41(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 22700558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering.
    Kushniruk A
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 11922931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.
    Magrabi F; Ammenwerth E; Hyppönen H; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M; Scott P; Talmon J; Georgiou A
    Yearb Med Inform; 2016 Nov; (1):61-69. PubMed ID: 27830232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study.
    Ammenwerth E; Iller C; Mahler C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 16401336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.