These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14519405)

  • 21. The Imperative of Solving Nurses' Usability Problems With Health Information Technology.
    Staggers N; Elias BL; Makar E; Alexander GL
    J Nurs Adm; 2018 Apr; 48(4):191-196. PubMed ID: 29570144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Decision tools in health care: focus on the problem, not the solution.
    Liu J; Wyatt JC; Altman DG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Jan; 6():4. PubMed ID: 16426446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A proposal to use a balanced scorecard to evaluate Information for Health: an information strategy for the modern NHS (1998-2005).
    Protti D
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 11922937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis.
    Anderson JG
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 11922934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation in health informatics: computer simulation.
    Anderson JG
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):151-64. PubMed ID: 11922932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating the Challenges and Opportunities in Home Care to Facilitate Effective Information Technology Adoption.
    Koru G; Alhuwail D; Topaz M; Norcio AF; Mills ME
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2016 Jan; 17(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 26612483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolving Health IT Systems Evaluation: The Convergence of Health Informatics and HTA.
    Doupi P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():220-36. PubMed ID: 27198105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computational tools for the modern andrologist.
    Niederberger C
    J Androl; 1996; 17(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 8957688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Framework of 'p'-Benefits in Health Information Technology Implementation.
    Kuziemsky CE; Keshavjee K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():232-6. PubMed ID: 25676979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a pulmonary graphical display in the medical intensive care unit: an observational study.
    Wachter SB; Markewitz B; Rose R; Westenskow D
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15896697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A tool for software and hardware evaluation.
    Kokol P
    J Med Syst; 1996 Jun; 20(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8798948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. IMIA Working Group 15: technology assessment and quality development in health informatics.
    van Gennip EM
    Int J Med Inform; 1999 Dec; 56(1-3):9-12. PubMed ID: 10659930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
    Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders.
    Fischer SH; David D; Crotty BH; Dierks M; Safran C
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Sep; 83(9):624-35. PubMed ID: 24996581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sociotechnical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of point-of-care mobile computing devices: a case study conducted in India.
    Sittig DF; Kahol K; Singh H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():515-9. PubMed ID: 23920608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer Rx: more harm than good?
    Wall R
    J Med Syst; 1991 Dec; 15(5-6):321-34. PubMed ID: 1812185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experiences with the development, implementation and evaluation of automated decision support systems.
    de Clercq P; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1033-7. PubMed ID: 15360969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A research proposal to study the impact of an automated charting and assessment system.
    Newbold SK; Curran CR; Henson JL; Lee T; McDowell DE; Gassert CA
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1088. PubMed ID: 8591375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Health Information Technology - Key Elements in the Framework.
    Lee TT
    J Nurs Res; 2016 Dec; 24(4):283-285. PubMed ID: 27846099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.
    Ammenwerth E; de Keizer N
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 15778794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.