606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14519874)
1. Osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma: assessment with MR imaging.
Elias DA; White LM; Simpson DJ; Kandel RA; Tomlinson G; Bell RS; Wunder JS
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 14519874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local Staging of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Emphasis on Assessment of Neurovascular Encasement-Value of MR Imaging in 174 Confirmed Cases.
Holzapfel K; Regler J; Baum T; Rechl H; Specht K; Haller B; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Gradinger R; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 25584707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can MR imaging be used to predict tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcoma?
Zhao F; Ahlawat S; Farahani SJ; Weber KL; Montgomery EA; Carrino JA; Fayad LM
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 24611604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of primary lymphoma of bone: variability of T2-weighted signal intensity.
White LM; Schweitzer ME; Khalili K; Howarth DJ; Wunder JS; Bell RS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1243-7. PubMed ID: 9574594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft-tissue sarcoma involving bone or neurovascular structures: MR imaging prognostic factors.
Panicek DM; Go SD; Healey JH; Leung DH; Brennan MF; Lewis JJ
Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 9393550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Correlation of MRI features to histopathologic grade of soft tissue sarcoma].
Liu QY; Li HG; Chen JY; Liang BL
Ai Zheng; 2008 Aug; 27(8):856-60. PubMed ID: 18710621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Staging and re-staging of soft tissue sarcoma using MRI. Usefulness of contrast media].
Barile A; Caulo M; Zugaro L; Di Cesare E; Gallucci M; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):444-55. PubMed ID: 11479441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of malignant soft-tissue tumors.
Hanna SL; Fletcher BD
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1995 Nov; 3(4):629-50. PubMed ID: 8564687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.
Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of MR imaging for estimating intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma.
Onikul E; Fletcher BD; Parham DM; Chen G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1211-5. PubMed ID: 8911182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma.
Choi BB; Jee WH; Sunwoo HJ; Cho JH; Kim JY; Chun KA; Hong SJ; Chung HW; Sung MS; Lee YS; Chung YG
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):542-7. PubMed ID: 23041161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Foci of decreased signal on T2-weighted MR images in leiomyosarcomas of soft tissue: correlation between MR and histological findings.
Pilavaki M; Drevelegas A; Nenopoulou H; Scordalaki A; Chourmouzi D; Sofroniadis I; Dimitriadis AS
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 15294338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synovial sarcoma: MR imaging findings in 34 patients.
Jones BC; Sundaram M; Kransdorf MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):827-30. PubMed ID: 8396848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?
Moore SL; Kransdorf MJ; Schweitzer ME; Murphey MD; Babb JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1387-93. PubMed ID: 22623553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of chemical-shift MR imaging to differentiate between adrenal adenomas and non adenoma adrenal lesions.
Maurea S; Imbriaco M; D'Angelillo M; Mollica C; Camera L; Salvatore M
Radiol Med; 2006 Aug; 111(5):674-86. PubMed ID: 16791464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed müllerian sarcoma of the uterus: MR imaging findings.
Shapeero LG; Hricak H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):317-9. PubMed ID: 2546411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of vascular invasion by musculoskeletal tumors of the limbs: use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Feydy A; Anract P; Tomeno B; Chevrot A; Drapé JL
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):611-21. PubMed ID: 16436820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence: added value of functional MR imaging techniques at 3.0 T.
Del Grande F; Subhawong T; Weber K; Aro M; Mugera C; Fayad LM
Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 24495264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Major salivary gland lesions: correlation of MR findings with flow cytometric DNA analysis and prognosis.
Takashima S; Sone S; Horii A; Okamoto S; Yoshida J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 8911200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MR imaging as a stand-alone sequence for diagnosis.
Hecht EM; Holland AE; Israel GM; Hahn WY; Kim DC; West AB; Babb JS; Taouli B; Lee VS; Krinsky GA
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):438-47. PubMed ID: 16641353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
