These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14519880)
21. [Preliminary trial of three-dimensional water-excitation magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging of articular cartilage]. Yoshioka H; Lang P; Ikeda K; Niitsu M; Itai Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Sep; 61(10):545-7. PubMed ID: 11676173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative evaluation of knee cartilage and meniscus destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using T1ρ and T2 mapping. Meng XH; Wang Z; Guo L; Liu XC; Zhang YW; Zhang ZW; Ma XL Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():91-97. PubMed ID: 29103482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Knee joint cartilage in magnetic resonance tomography. MR chondrovolumetry (MR-CVM) using fat-suppressed FLASH 3D sequence]. Eckstein F; Sittek H; Gavazzeni A; Milz S; Kiefer B; Putz R; Reiser M Radiologe; 1995 Feb; 35(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 7740121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of T1, T1ρ, and T2 values of the ulnocarpal disc in healthy subjects at 3 tesla. Rauscher I; Bender B; Grözinger G; Luz O; Pohmann R; Erb M; Schick F; Martirosian P Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 32(9):1085-90. PubMed ID: 24960365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the relationship between T1ρ and T2 values and patella cartilage degeneration in patients of the same age group. Nishioka H; Hirose J; Okamoto N; Okada T; Oka K; Taniwaki T; Nakamura E; Yamashita Y; Mizuta H Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):463-468. PubMed ID: 25559169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The compositional difference between ankle and knee cartilage demonstrated by T2 mapping at 7 Tesla MR. Juras V; Zbýň Š; Mlynarik V; Szomolanyi P; Hager B; Baer P; Frollo I; Trattnig S Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):771-7. PubMed ID: 26971422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Proteoglycan depletion-induced changes in transverse relaxation maps of cartilage: comparison of T2 and T1rho. Regatte RR; Akella SV; Borthakur A; Kneeland JB; Reddy R Acad Radiol; 2002 Dec; 9(12):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12553350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. T1ρ imaging demonstrates early changes in the lateral patella in patients with patellofemoral pain and maltracking. Thuillier DU; Souza RB; Wu S; Luke A; Li X; Feeley BT Am J Sports Med; 2013 Aug; 41(8):1813-8. PubMed ID: 23845401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence. Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vivo morphometry and functional analysis of human articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging--from image to data, from data to theory. Eckstein F; Reiser M; Englmeier KH; Putz R Anat Embryol (Berl); 2001 Mar; 203(3):147-73. PubMed ID: 11303902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. T1ρ is superior to T2 mapping for the evaluation of articular cartilage denaturalization with osteoarthritis: radiological-pathological correlation after total knee arthroplasty. Takayama Y; Hatakenaka M; Tsushima H; Okazaki K; Yoshiura T; Yonezawa M; Nishikawa K; Iwamoto Y; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):e192-8. PubMed ID: 23265927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduction of residual dipolar interaction in cartilage by spin-lock technique. Akella SV; Regatte RR; Wheaton AJ; Borthakur A; Reddy R Magn Reson Med; 2004 Nov; 52(5):1103-9. PubMed ID: 15508163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Longitudinal evaluation of T1ρ and T2 spatial distribution in osteoarthritic and healthy medial knee cartilage. Schooler J; Kumar D; Nardo L; McCulloch C; Li X; Link TM; Majumdar S Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 Jan; 22(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 24188868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. Eckstein F; Westhoff J; Sittek H; Maag KP; Haubner M; Faber S; Englmeier KH; Reiser M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 9490936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]