96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14519885)
1. By-patient performance characteristics of CT colonography: importance of polyp size threshold data.
Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):291-3; author reply 293; discussion 293. PubMed ID: 14519885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study.
Summers RM; Beaulieu CF; Pusanik LM; Malley JD; Jeffrey RB; Glazer DI; Napel S
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 10887263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
Chen SC; Lu DS; Hecht JR; Kadell BM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10063842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques.
McFarland EG; Brink JA; Pilgram TK; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Hirselj DA; Weinstock L; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 11161149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography.
Pochaczevsky R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):241. PubMed ID: 11756132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; McCollough CH; Harmsen WS
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 11323473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colon cancer screening, polyp size, and CT colonography: making sense of it all?
Rockey DC
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):2006-9. PubMed ID: 17188963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections.
Paik DS; Beaulieu CF; Jeffrey RB; Karadi CA; Napel S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 10752876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: lessons from mammography.
Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1539-41. PubMed ID: 10845477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.
Fletcher JG; Johnson CD; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Ahlquist DA; Reed JE; Harmsen WS; Wilson LA
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):704-11. PubMed ID: 10966698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population.
Summers RM; Johnson CD; Pusanik LM; Malley JD; Youssef AM; Reed JE
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11274534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography].
Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Iannaccone R; Iori S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 11307507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy.
Macari M; Berman P; Dicker M; Milano A; Megibow AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):561-4. PubMed ID: 10470879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
