188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14520030)
1. The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.
Lindsey DP; Swanson KE; Fuchs P; Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Yerby SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(19):2192-7. PubMed ID: 14520030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.
Kettler A; Drumm J; Heuer F; Haeussler K; Mack C; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 17981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis.
Lafage V; Gangnet N; Sénégas J; Lavaste F; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1706-13. PubMed ID: 17632390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical study of the instrumented and adjacent lumbar levels after In-Space interspinous spacer insertion.
Park SW; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 20433305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.
Tsai KJ; Murakami H; Lowery GL; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17087886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.
Shim CS; Park SW; Lee SH; Lim TJ; Chun K; Kim DH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E820-7. PubMed ID: 18923305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of cement augmentation and extension of posterior instrumentation on stabilization and adjacent level effects in the elderly spine.
Tan JS; Singh S; Zhu QA; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2728-40. PubMed ID: 19050578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of a novel minimally invasive lumbar interspinous spacer: effects on kinematics, facet loads, and foramen height.
Lazaro BC; Brasiliense LB; Sawa AG; Reyes PM; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):126-32; discussion 132-3. PubMed ID: 20173562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
