BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14520097)

  • 1. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner CW
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1726-30. PubMed ID: 14520097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 15224850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.
    Gantz BJ; Dunn C; Oleson J; Hansen M; Parkinson A; Turner C
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Apr; 126(4):962-73. PubMed ID: 26756395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of acoustic and electrical hearing.
    Turner C; Gantz BJ; Reiss L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 18816425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results.
    Parkinson AJ; Arcaroli J; Staller SJ; Arndt PL; Cosgriff A; Ebinger K
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):41S-48S. PubMed ID: 11883766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review in 13 cases.
    Luetje CM; Thedinger BS; Buckler LR; Dawson KL; Lisbona KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 17529849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():63-8. PubMed ID: 17063013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.