236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14520696)
1. Breast cancer in young women (< or = 35 years): Genomic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Weber-Mangal S; Sinn HP; Popp S; Klaes R; Emig R; Bentz M; Mansmann U; Bastert G; Bartram CR; Jauch A
Int J Cancer; 2003 Nov; 107(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 14520696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic loss of 18p predicts an adverse clinical outcome in patients with high-risk breast cancer.
Climent J; Martinez-Climent JA; Blesa D; Garcia-Barchino MJ; Saez R; Sánchez-Izquierdo D; Azagra P; Lluch A; Garcia-Conde J
Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Dec; 8(12):3863-9. PubMed ID: 12473601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in genetic alterations between primary lobular and ductal breast cancers detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Günther K; Merkelbach-Bruse S; Amo-Takyi BK; Handt S; Schröder W; Tietze L
J Pathol; 2001 Jan; 193(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 11169514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic aberrations in carcinomas of the uterine corpus.
Micci F; Teixeira MR; Haugom L; Kristensen G; Abeler VM; Heim S
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2004 Jul; 40(3):229-46. PubMed ID: 15139002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Correlation with histoprognostic variables and c-erbB-2 immunoexpression.
Malamou-Mitsi VD; Syrrou M; Georgiou I; Pagoulatos G; Agnantis NJ
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 10606182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In lymph node-negative invasive breast carcinomas, specific chromosomal aberrations are strongly associated with high mitotic activity and predict outcome more accurately than grade, tumour diameter, and oestrogen receptor.
Janssen EA; Baak JP; Guervós MA; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M; Hermsen MA
J Pathol; 2003 Dec; 201(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 14648658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of chromosomal changes with comparative genomic hybridization in sporadic breast cancer in Mexican women.
Valladares A; Salamanca F; Madrigal-Bujaidar E; Arenas D
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Jul; 152(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 15262439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns of chromosomal imbalances in invasive breast cancer.
Richard F; Pacyna-Gengelbach M; Schlüns K; Fleige B; Winzer KJ; Szymas J; Dietel M; Petersen I; Schwendel A
Int J Cancer; 2000 May; 89(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 10861509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH.
Tirkkonen M; Tanner M; Karhu R; Kallioniemi A; Isola J; Kallioniemi OP
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1998 Mar; 21(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 9523192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic changes at specific stages of breast cancer progression detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Gao Y; Niu Y; Wang X; Wei L; Lu S
J Mol Med (Berl); 2009 Feb; 87(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18936904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of chromosomal imbalances defines subgroups of breast cancer with distinct clinical features and prognosis. A study of 305 tumors by comparative genomic hybridization.
Rennstam K; Ahlstedt-Soini M; Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Borg A; Karhu R; Tanner M; Tirkkonen M; Isola J
Cancer Res; 2003 Dec; 63(24):8861-8. PubMed ID: 14695203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic alterations in sporadic synchronous primary breast cancer using array and metaphase comparative genomic hybridization.
Ghazani AA; Arneson N; Warren K; Pintilie M; Bayani J; Squire JA; Done SJ
Neoplasia; 2007 Jun; 9(6):511-20. PubMed ID: 17603634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic analysis of 53 lymph node-negative breast carcinomas by CGH and relation to clinical, pathological, morphometric, and DNA cytometric prognostic factors.
Hermsen MA; Baak JP; Meijer GA; Weiss JM; Walboomers JW; Snijders PJ; van Diest PJ
J Pathol; 1998 Dec; 186(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 10209483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinct chromosomal aberrations of ampulla of Vater and pancreatic head cancers detected by laser capture microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization.
Chang MC; Chang YT; Tien YW; Sun CT; Wu MS; Lin JT
Oncol Rep; 2005 Oct; 14(4):867-72. PubMed ID: 16142344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative genomic hybridization reveals frequent gains of 20q, 8q, 11q, 12p, and 17q, and losses of 18q, 9p, and 15q in pancreatic cancer.
Mahlamäki EH; Höglund M; Gorunova L; Karhu R; Dawiskiba S; Andrén-Sandberg A; Kallioniemi OP; Johansson B
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Dec; 20(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 9408755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of genomic abnormalities between BRCAX and sporadic breast cancers studied by comparative genomic hybridization.
Gronwald J; Jauch A; Cybulski C; Schoell B; Böhm-Steuer B; Lener M; Grabowska E; Górski B; Jakubowska A; Domagała W; Chosia M; Scott RJ; Lubiński J
Int J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 114(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 15540206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic imbalances detected by comparative genomic hybridization are prognostic markers in invasive ductal breast carcinomas.
Zudaire I; Odero MD; Caballero C; Valenti C; Martínez-Penuela JM; Isola J; Calasanz MJ
Histopathology; 2002 Jun; 40(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 12047766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extensive ductal carcinoma In situ with small foci of invasive ductal carcinoma: evidence of genetic resemblance by CGH.
Aubele M; Mattis A; Zitzelsberger H; Walch A; Kremer M; Welzl G; Höfler H; Werner M
Int J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 85(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 10585588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA sequence losses on chromosomes 11p and 18q are associated with clinical outcome in lymph node-negative ductal breast cancer.
Dellas A; Torhorst J; Schultheiss E; Mihatsch MJ; Moch H
Clin Cancer Res; 2002 May; 8(5):1210-6. PubMed ID: 12006540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
