These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14523309)

  • 1. Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics, and EMG in recreational runners.
    Mündermann A; Nigg BM; Humble RN; Stefanyshyn DJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Oct; 35(10):1710-9. PubMed ID: 14523309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foot orthoses affect frequency components of muscle activity in the lower extremity.
    Mündermann A; Wakeling JM; Nigg BM; Humble RN; Stefanyshyn DJ
    Gait Posture; 2006 Apr; 23(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 15946847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners.
    MacLean C; Davis IM; Hamill J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 16603287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short- and long-term influences of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics.
    MacLean CL; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Clin J Sport Med; 2008 Jul; 18(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 18614885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
    Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of three levels of foot orthotic wedging on the surface electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait.
    Murley GS; Bird AR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1074-80. PubMed ID: 16930793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot orthotics affect lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during running.
    Mündermann A; Nigg BM; Humble RN; Stefanyshyn DJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Mar; 18(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 12620789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high- and low-arched individuals during walking.
    Zifchock RA; Davis I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18757124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Nigg BM; De Boer RW; Fisher V
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 7898346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visualizing changes in lower body coordination with different types of foot orthoses using self-organizing maps (SOM).
    Lamb PF; Mündermann A; Bartlett RM; Robins A
    Gait Posture; 2011 Oct; 34(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 21821418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of orthotic devices prescribed using pressure data on lower extremity kinematics and pressures beneath the shoe during running.
    Dixon SJ; McNally K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of foot orthotics on running economy: methodological considerations.
    Burke JR; Papuga MO
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 May; 35(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 22632593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinematics and electromyography of lower limb muscles in overground and treadmill running.
    Wank V; Frick U; Schmidtbleicher D
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Oct; 19(7):455-61. PubMed ID: 9839841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of contouring and hardness of foot orthoses on ratings of perceived comfort.
    Mills K; Blanch P; Vicenzino B
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Aug; 43(8):1507-12. PubMed ID: 21233775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of foot orthotics on rearfoot and tibia joint coupling patterns and variability.
    Ferber R; Davis IM; Williams DS
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 15652545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of longitudinal biomechanical adaptation to shoe degradation between the dominant and non-dominant legs during running.
    Kong PW; Candelaria NG; Smith D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Jun; 30(3):606-13. PubMed ID: 21333368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of neutral-cushioned running shoes on plantar pressure loading and comfort in athletes with cavus feet: a crossover randomized controlled trial.
    Wegener C; Burns J; Penkala S
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2139-46. PubMed ID: 18577583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baseline measures are altered in biomechanical studies.
    Stergiou N; Scott MM
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 15519354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of orthopaedic-technical aid on the kinematics and kinetics of the knee joint of patients with neuro-orthopaedic diseases.
    Lampe R; Mitternacht J; Schrödl S; Gerdesmeyer L; Natrath M; Gradinger R
    Brain Dev; 2004 Jun; 26(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15130687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.