346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14523406)
21. Biomedical research. Rejecting 'big science' tag, Collins sets five themes for NIH.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):927. PubMed ID: 19696320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Collins sets out his vision for the NIH.
Dolgin E
Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7258):939. PubMed ID: 19693051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medicine. The NIH Roadmap.
Zerhouni E
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5642):63-72. PubMed ID: 14526066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The challenge of translational research--a perspective from the NINDS.
Finkelstein R; Miller T; Baughman R
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 5 Suppl():1029-30. PubMed ID: 12403978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomedical research. The graying of NIH research.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):848-9. PubMed ID: 18988821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Flat NIH funding threatens scientific progress.
J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):15N, 22N. PubMed ID: 17475944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
Hand E
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
Miller G; Couzin J
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. NCI defends research involving minority groups.
Gottlieb S
Nat Med; 1999 Mar; 5(3):254. PubMed ID: 10086369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. David versus Goliath.
Check E; Castellani F
Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7017):546-8. PubMed ID: 15577877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The family medicine road to the NIH roadmap.
Johnson MS;
Ann Fam Med; 2006; 4(1):89. PubMed ID: 16449404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Peer review at National Institutes of Health: small steps forward.
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):A15-7. PubMed ID: 19067350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The NIH, research institutions and industry: working together on a shared goal.
Omary MB
Gastroenterology; 2007 May; 132(5):1647-50. PubMed ID: 17484859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. NIH innovation letter.
Ness RB
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 May; 16(5):411-2. PubMed ID: 16647632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A lost generation.
Weinberg RA
Cell; 2006 Jul; 126(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 16839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Roadmap or roadkill: a pharmacologist's analysis of the NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative.
Lazo JS
Mol Interv; 2006 Oct; 6(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 17035662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. NerveCenter: Biomedical research funding a vital part of the economic stimulus plan.
Lindsey H
Ann Neurol; 2009 Feb; 65(2):A9-A11. PubMed ID: 19260032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Changes in the research landscape require a new approach, while continuing to fund the highest scientific priorities. Jennifer Taylor talks with Dr Elizabeth Nabel, Director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library.
Nabel E
Eur Heart J; 2009 Jun; 30(12):1423-5. PubMed ID: 19533911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Disappointment in slow-down for biomedical funding.
Wadman M
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):559. PubMed ID: 15729751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Teitelbaum MS
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
