BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14524223)

  • 1. The impact of a history of child sexual assault on women's decisions and experiences of cervical screening.
    Harsanyi A; Mott S; Kendall S; Blight A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2003 Sep; 32(9):761-2. PubMed ID: 14524223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
    Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
    Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self perceived standards of care in women's health. An illustrative case.
    Ward J; Bauman A
    Aust Fam Physician; 1989 Feb; 18(2):91, 94, 96. PubMed ID: 2705958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sociocultural barriers to cervical screening in South Auckland, New Zealand.
    Lovell S; Kearns RA; Friesen W
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Jul; 65(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 17433510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decisions about Pap tests: what influences women and providers?
    Fiebig DG; Haas M; Hossain I; Street DJ; Viney R
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 May; 68(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 19339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health professionals' responses to disclosure of child sexual abuse history: female child sexual abuse survivors' experiences.
    McGregor K; Jülich S; Glover M; Gautam J
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 May; 19(3):239-54. PubMed ID: 20509075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical screening result communication: a focus-group investigation of English women's experiences and needs.
    Goldsmith MR; Austoker J; Marsh G; Kehoe ST; Bankhead CR
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Oct; 17(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 18842971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening.
    Park S; Chang S; Chung C
    Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 16150010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socio-cultural influences on Chinese women's attendance for cervical screening.
    Holroyd E; Twinn S; Adab P
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Apr; 46(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 15030441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marrying research, clinical practice and cervical screening in Australian Aboriginal women in western New South Wales, Australia.
    Read CM; Bateson DJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1117. PubMed ID: 19459723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The health-care practices of Vietnamese-Canadian women: cultural influences on breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Donnelly TT
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Mar; 38(1):82-101. PubMed ID: 16671282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women.
    Amarin ZO; Badria LF; Obeidat BR
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 18561732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia.
    Markovic M; Kesic V; Topic L; Matejic B
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 61(12):2528-35. PubMed ID: 15953668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The health consequences of child sexual abuse and partner abuse for women attending general practice.
    Hegarty K
    Aust Fam Physician; 2003 Sep; 32(9):760. PubMed ID: 14524222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Australian women's needs and preferences for information about human papillomavirus in cervical screening.
    McCaffery K; Irwig L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 16156944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions and barriers to cervical cancer screening in a rural district of Mutoko, Mashonaland East Province, Zimbabwe.
    Tarwireyi F
    Cent Afr J Med; 2005; 51(11-12):120-2. PubMed ID: 17447344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden.
    Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Mar; 29(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18266164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in the prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence: a cohort analysis.
    Casey EA; Nurius PS
    Violence Vict; 2006 Oct; 21(5):629-44. PubMed ID: 17022354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.