These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14524684)

  • 1. Upgrading of a small overloaded activated sludge plant using a MBBR system.
    Andreottola G; Foladori P; Gatti G; Nardelli P; Pettena M; Ragazzi M
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003; 38(10):2317-28. PubMed ID: 14524684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor and activated sludge system: a pilot plant experiment.
    Di Trapani D; Mannina G; Torregrossa M; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):891-902. PubMed ID: 20182067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Hvala N; Vrecko D; Burica O; Strazar M; Levstek M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):325-32. PubMed ID: 12361028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor followed by moving bed biofilm reactor.
    Tawfik A; El-Gohary F; Temmink H
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Feb; 33(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 19404682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement of nutrient removal performance of activated sludge with a novel hybrid biofilm process.
    Güneş G; Hallaç E; Özgan M; Ertürk A; Okutman Taş D; Çokgor E; Güven D; Takacs I; Erdinçler A; Insel G
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2019 Mar; 42(3):379-390. PubMed ID: 30456700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes.
    Tam HL; Tang DT; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):59-65. PubMed ID: 15656296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upgrading of an activated sludge wastewater treatment plant by adding a moving bed biofilm reactor as pre-treatment and ozonation followed by biofiltration for enhanced COD reduction: design and operation experience.
    Kaindl N
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(11):2710-9. PubMed ID: 21099060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dairy wastewater treatment in a moving bed biofilm reactor.
    Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ragazzi M; Villa R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):321-8. PubMed ID: 12201118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the performance of MBBR and SBR systems for the treatment of anaerobic reactor biowaste effluent.
    Comett-Ambriz I; Gonzalez-Martinez S; Wilderer P
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):155-61. PubMed ID: 12926683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carbon and nitrogen removal in a biofilm reactors system with raw wastewater stream distribution.
    Tomaszek JA; Grabas M
    Environ Technol; 2007 May; 28(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 17615964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new process for enriching nitrifiers in activated sludge through separate heterotrophic wasting from biofilm carriers.
    Parker DS; Rusten B; Wien A; Siljudalen JG
    Water Environ Res; 2002; 74(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 11995869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for increasing the rate of anammox attachment in a sidestream deammonification MBBR.
    Klaus S; McLee P; Schuler AJ; Bott C
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 74(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 27386988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of biomass from integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS), moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating recalcitrant organics: Importance of attached biomass.
    Huang C; Shi Y; Xue J; Zhang Y; Gamal El-Din M; Liu Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2017 Mar; 326():120-129. PubMed ID: 28012315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mathematical modelling and comparative analysis of treatment technologies for upgrading wastewater treatment plants: A case study of biofilm reactors in El-Gouna, Egypt.
    Osama A; Kinnawy MA; Moussa MS; Riechelmann C; Hosney H
    Environ Res; 2023 Dec; 238(Pt 1):117008. PubMed ID: 37669734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oxygen transfer improvement in MBBR process.
    Collivignarelli MC; Abbà A; Bertanza G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(11):10727-10737. PubMed ID: 30778935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nitrogen removal from sludge water with SBR process: start-up of a full-scale plant in the municipal wastewater treatment plant at Ingolstadt, Germany.
    Vallés-Morales MJ; Mendoza-Roca JA; Bes-Piá A; Iborra-Clar A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):51-8. PubMed ID: 15656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of a moving-bed biofilm reactor for sulfur-oxidizing autotrophic denitrification.
    Cui YX; Wu D; Mackey HR; Chui HK; Chen GH
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 77(3-4):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 29488966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a combined process of moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) and chemical coagulation for dyeing wastewater treatment.
    Shin DH; Shin WS; Kim YH; Han MH; Choi SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(9):181-9. PubMed ID: 17163056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary biomass characterization in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor.
    Di Iaconi C; Ramadori R; Lopez A; Passino R
    Ann Chim; 2004 Dec; 94(12):889-98. PubMed ID: 15689025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.