These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14526060)

  • 1. A suggestion for the multiple author issue.
    Raff H
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5642):55-7. PubMed ID: 14526060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple authors, multiple problems.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5634):733. PubMed ID: 12907762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
    Couzin J; Unger K
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.
    Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
    Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 19329007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Special report: taking on the cheats.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):258-9. PubMed ID: 15902219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.
    Wager E
    Maturitas; 2009 Feb; 62(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 19147308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Author, author burning bright; author, author are you right?
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2006 Apr; 20(6):600. PubMed ID: 16581966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Good scientific practice].
    Andersen D
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Feb; 161(5):610-8. PubMed ID: 9989200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An apology: inadvertent error in our article published in June 2005 issue of the Annals of Neurology (Ann Neurol 2005;57:874-882).
    Bang OY
    Ann Neurol; 2005 Oct; 58(4):659. PubMed ID: 16178008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Author and authorship in medical journals].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2009; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19214815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Authorship and acknowledgements.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Jun; 50(6):563-5; quiz 566. PubMed ID: 19551307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The concept of "authorship" in scientific journals. Letter].
    Matías-Guiu J
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Feb; 25(138):314. PubMed ID: 9147774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts.
    Höffken K; Gabbert H
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 135(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 19125293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines for citing multiple authors.
    Davidhizar R
    Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14735765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Authorship and co-authorship].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific publishing. Retracted papers spur million-dollar lawsuit.
    Travis J
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):425. PubMed ID: 16239453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who should be an author?
    Calder PC
    Br J Nutr; 2009 Mar; 101(6):775. PubMed ID: 19278563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Authorship: an ethical issue.
    Menezes RG; Kanchan T; Arun M; Manipady S
    Natl Med J India; 2006; 19(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 16756206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.