These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14526307)

  • 1. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience.
    Boucher M; Bujold E; Marquette GP; Vezina Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 14526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
    Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.
    Mowat A; Gardener G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Feb; 54(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24359099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tocolysis in term breech external cephalic version.
    Nor Azlin MI; Haliza H; Mahdy ZA; Anson I; Fahya MN; Jamil MA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jan; 88(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15617697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
    Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive Factors for Successful Vaginal Delivery after a Trial of External Cephalic Version: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 946 Women.
    Bilgory A; Minich O; Shvaikovsky M; Gurevich G; Lessing JB; Olteanu I
    Am J Perinatol; 2023 Nov; 40(15):1679-1686. PubMed ID: 34775580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
    Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Marquette GP; Boucher M; Thériault D; Rinfret D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):859-61. PubMed ID: 8885736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sublingual nitroglycerine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version: a comparative study.
    Bujold E; Sergerie M; Masse A; Verschelden G; Bédard MJ; Dubé J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Mar; 25(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 12610672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study.
    Levin G; Ezra Y; Weill Y; Kabiri D; Pollack RN; Rottenstreich A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):3008-3013. PubMed ID: 31608725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External cephalic version with an amniotic fluid index < or = 10: a systematic review.
    Haas DM; Magann EF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Oct; 18(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 16318975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version.
    Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():178-181. PubMed ID: 30308400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery.
    Leung TY; Fok WY; Chan LW; Law LW; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):416-9. PubMed ID: 16526099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Success rates of early versus late initiation of external cephalic version.
    Lavie A; Reicher L; Avraham S; Ram M; Maslovitz S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Apr; 145(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 30706464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External Cephalic Version-A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation.
    Cobec IM; Varzaru VB; Kövendy T; Kuban L; Eftenoiu AE; Moatar AE; Rempen A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(11):. PubMed ID: 36363576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
    Impey L; Pandit M
    BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study.
    Burgos J; Eguiguren N; Quintana E; Cobos P; Centeno Mdel M; Larrieta R; Fernández-Llebrez L
    J Perinat Med; 2010; 38(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20047524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
    de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique.
    Trobo D; Pintado P; Ortega V; Yllana F; Hernández C; Mendizábal R; De León-Luis J
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):717-723. PubMed ID: 31369397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.