712 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14526380)
1. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National politicians block GM progress.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):918-9. PubMed ID: 10973199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
König A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe.
Tencalla F
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16188360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Much food, many problems.
Trewavas A
Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6759):231-2. PubMed ID: 10580487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops.
Smyth S; Khachatourians GG; Phillips PW
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 12042844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US food-safety body hears protests over genetically modified food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):571. PubMed ID: 10604452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientists cry foul as Europe plays politics with GM crops.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 18259156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetically modified crops: methodology, benefits, regulation and public concerns.
Halford NG; Shewry PR
Br Med Bull; 2000; 56(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 10885105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. European Union in disarray over GM seeds.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. EC struggles to unravel regulations.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 10888826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Green ag minister wreaks havoc on Italy's agbiotech.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):919-20. PubMed ID: 10973200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Wilson A; Latham J; Steinbrecher R
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. We must not be bound by anti-GM extremists.
Miller HI
Nature; 2001 Mar; 410(6827):408. PubMed ID: 11260683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food.
Celec P; Kukucková M; Renczésová V; Natarajan S; Pálffy R; Gardlík R; Hodosy J; Behuliak M; Vlková B; Minárik G; Szemes T; Stuchlík S; Turna J
Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Dec; 59(10):531-40. PubMed ID: 16298508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
