139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1452671)
1. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Murray CL; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jun; 28(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 2199483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1218-21. PubMed ID: 2753999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.
Skulnick M; Small GW; Simor AE; Low DE; Khosid H; Fraser S; Chua R
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Sep; 29(9):2086-8. PubMed ID: 1774342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two ELISA's for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical swabs.
Altaie SS; Meier FA; Centor RM; Wakabongo M; Toksoz D; Harvey KM; Basinger E; Johnson BA; Brookman RR; Dalton HP
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 1424514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens from men and women by a coamplification PCR assay.
Crotchfelt KA; Welsh LE; DeBonville D; Rosenstraus M; Quinn TC
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 35(6):1536-40. PubMed ID: 9163477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.
Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM
Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME
Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.
Quinn TC; Welsh L; Lentz A; Crotchfelt K; Zenilman J; Newhall J; Gaydos C
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of self-collected samples in contrast to practitioner-collected samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction among women living in remote areas.
Knox J; Tabrizi SN; Miller P; Petoumenos K; Law M; Chen S; Garland SM
Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Nov; 29(11):647-54. PubMed ID: 12438900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid, on-site diagnosis of chlamydial urethritis in men by detection of antigens in urethral swabs and urine.
Sellors J; Mahony J; Jang D; Pickard L; Castriciano S; Landis S; Stewart I; Seidelman W; Cunningham I; Chernesky M
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):407-9. PubMed ID: 2007651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine, female endocervical swab, and patient obtained vaginal swab specimens.
Tanaka M; Nakayama H; Sagiyama K; Haraoka M; Yoshida H; Hagiwara T; Akazawa K; Naito S
J Clin Pathol; 2000 May; 53(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 10889816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens using an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay.
Gun-Munro J; Mahony J; Lyn P; Luinstra K; Smaill F; Richardson H
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8919737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test.
Jones MF; Smith TF; Houglum AJ; Herrmann JE
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):465-7. PubMed ID: 6386864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females?
Mahto M; Mallinson H
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Welsh LE; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3078-81. PubMed ID: 9399497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C
Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
