These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1452671)
1. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Murray CL; Levisky JS J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jun; 28(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 2199483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Levisky JS J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1218-21. PubMed ID: 2753999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection. Skulnick M; Small GW; Simor AE; Low DE; Khosid H; Fraser S; Chua R J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Sep; 29(9):2086-8. PubMed ID: 1774342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two ELISA's for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical swabs. Altaie SS; Meier FA; Centor RM; Wakabongo M; Toksoz D; Harvey KM; Basinger E; Johnson BA; Brookman RR; Dalton HP Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 1424514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary specimens from men and women by a coamplification PCR assay. Crotchfelt KA; Welsh LE; DeBonville D; Rosenstraus M; Quinn TC J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 35(6):1536-40. PubMed ID: 9163477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture. Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. Quinn TC; Welsh L; Lentz A; Crotchfelt K; Zenilman J; Newhall J; Gaydos C J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of self-collected samples in contrast to practitioner-collected samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction among women living in remote areas. Knox J; Tabrizi SN; Miller P; Petoumenos K; Law M; Chen S; Garland SM Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Nov; 29(11):647-54. PubMed ID: 12438900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid, on-site diagnosis of chlamydial urethritis in men by detection of antigens in urethral swabs and urine. Sellors J; Mahony J; Jang D; Pickard L; Castriciano S; Landis S; Stewart I; Seidelman W; Cunningham I; Chernesky M J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):407-9. PubMed ID: 2007651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine, female endocervical swab, and patient obtained vaginal swab specimens. Tanaka M; Nakayama H; Sagiyama K; Haraoka M; Yoshida H; Hagiwara T; Akazawa K; Naito S J Clin Pathol; 2000 May; 53(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 10889816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic. Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens using an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay. Gun-Munro J; Mahony J; Lyn P; Luinstra K; Smaill F; Richardson H Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8919737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test. Jones MF; Smith TF; Houglum AJ; Herrmann JE J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):465-7. PubMed ID: 6386864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females? Mahto M; Mallinson H Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of endocervical specimen adequacy on PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Welsh LE; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3078-81. PubMed ID: 9399497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling. Szarewski A; Pompey A; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]