These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14528770)

  • 1. Comparison of diagnostic methods for dental caries.
    Meneghim Mde C; Assaf AV; Zanin L; Kozlowski FC; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 14528770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of different methods for diagnosing dental caries in epidemiological surveys.
    Assaf AV; Meneghim Mde C; Zanin L; Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 15541157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of approximal caries in 5-year-old Swedish children.
    Anderson M; Stecksén-Blicks C; Stenlund H; Ranggård L; Tsilingaridis G; Mejàre I
    Caries Res; 2005; 39(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 15741720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries: a problem.
    Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE; Eggink CO
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occurrence and distribution of caries in 6-year-old children in Blekinge, Sweden.
    Holst A; Braune K; Kjellberg-Larsson M
    Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(2-3):71-6. PubMed ID: 10431342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical-radiographic correlation in occlusal surfaces.
    Amerise C; Delgado AM; Romero S; Santana M
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2001; 14(1-2):40-5. PubMed ID: 15208936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
    Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of adjunct techniques for diagnosis of dental caries in an epidemiological situation.
    da Silva RP; Assaf AV; Pereira SM; Ambrosano GM; Mialhe FL; Pereira AC
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2011; 9(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 22068181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of diagnostic adjuncts to the measurement of caries prevalence at different caries thresholds.
    Assaf AV; Meneghim Mde C; Zanin L; Pardi V; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 14725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical applications of new advances in occlusal caries diagnosis.
    Milicich G
    N Z Dent J; 2000 Mar; 96(423):23-6. PubMed ID: 10860377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caries, bitewings, and treatment decisions.
    Tan PL; Evans RW; Morgan MV
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Jun; 47(2):138-41; quiz 182. PubMed ID: 12139267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of caries-detection methods under epidemiological setting.
    da Silva RP; Assaf AV; Pereira SM; Mialhe FL; Ambrosano GM; Meneghim Mde C; Pereira AC
    Am J Dent; 2011 Dec; 24(6):363-6. PubMed ID: 22263334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of hidden caries.
    Weerheijm KL; Gruythuysen RJ; van Amerongen WE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 1491078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal caries prevalence in 19-year-olds living in Sweden. A radiographic study in four counties.
    Forsling JO; Halling A; Lundin SA; Paulander J; Svenson B; Unell L; Wendt LK
    Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(2-3):59-70. PubMed ID: 10431341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate diagnosis of occlusal carious lesions--a stereo microscope evaluation of clinical diagnosis.
    Grossman ES; Cleaton-Jones PE; Côrtes DF; Daya NP; Parak RB; Fatti LP; Hargreaves JA
    SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):215-20. PubMed ID: 12229076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of epidemiological evaluations under different caries diagnostic thresholds.
    Kassawara AB; Assaf AV; Meneghim Mde C; Pereira AC; Topping G; Levin K; Ambrosano GM
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2007; 5(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 17722441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progression of posterior approximal carious lesions in Norwegian teenagers from 1982 to 1986.
    Lervik T; Haugejorden O; Aas C
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Aug; 48(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2220328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The progression of approximal caries in the permanent dentition of British children.
    Shaw L; Murray JJ
    Community Dent Health; 1986 Sep; 3(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 3463379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of occlusal carious lesions: an in vitro comparison of clinicians' diagnostic abilities at varying levels of experience.
    Swenson E; Hennessy B
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(1):60-6; quiz 67-8, 95-6. PubMed ID: 19146144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified dental examination for detection of cavitated carious lesions in school setting.
    Haleem A; Khan AA; Siddiqui MI
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 37(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19302575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.