These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14528898)

  • 21. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.
    Jo S; Kim JY; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 May; 216():103310. PubMed ID: 33892264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():125-37. PubMed ID: 24973562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. fMri studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection.
    Banich MT; Milham MP; Atchley R; Cohen NJ; Webb A; Wszalek T; Kramer AF; Liang ZP; Wright A; Shenker J; Magin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Nov; 12(6):988-1000. PubMed ID: 11177419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Top-down deactivation of interference from irrelevant spatial or verbal stimulus features.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2360-74. PubMed ID: 24980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
    Lee H; Jeong SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention.
    Law MB; Abrams RA
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Oct; 64(7):1017-27. PubMed ID: 12489658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional selection and the processing of task-irrelevant information: insights from fMRI examinations of the Stroop task.
    Banich MT; Milham MP; Jacobson BL; Webb A; Wszalek T; Cohen NJ; Kramer AF
    Prog Brain Res; 2001; 134():459-70. PubMed ID: 11702561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cueing of object orientation facilitates attentional selection of relevant objects.
    Wühr P
    Spat Vis; 2006; 19(5):459-77. PubMed ID: 17131651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():327. PubMed ID: 23761777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task.
    Irons JL; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):862-75. PubMed ID: 23444082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differential effect of HIV infection and alcoholism on conflict processing, attentional allocation, and perceptual load: evidence from a Stroop Match-to-Sample task.
    Schulte T; Mueller-Oehring EM; Rosenbloom MJ; Pfefferbaum A; Sullivan EV
    Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Jan; 57(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 15607302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional Capture From Inside vs. Outside the Attentional Focus.
    Manini G; Botta F; Martín-Arévalo E; Ferrari V; Lupiáñez J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():758747. PubMed ID: 34819898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.