These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14528945)

  • 1. It is necessary to validate each individual IMRT treatment plan before delivery. For the proposition.
    Ramsey C
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2271-2. PubMed ID: 14528945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It is necessary to validate each individual IMRT treatment plan before delivery. Against the proposition.
    Dube S
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2272-3. PubMed ID: 14528946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance and validation of individual IMRT treatment plans before delivery.
    Niemierko A
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):421-2. PubMed ID: 15000629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quality assurance phantom for IMRT dose verification.
    Ma CM; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Chen Y; Li JS; Deng J; Boyer AL
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 12696795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IMRT delivery verification using a spiral phantom.
    Richardson SL; Tomé WA; Orton NP; McNutt TR; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2553-8. PubMed ID: 14528978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
    Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual micro MLC commissioning.
    Drever L; Dickof P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(2):1-11. PubMed ID: 15940207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of quality control method for IMRT planning based on prior knowledge and novel measures derived from both OVHs and DVHs.
    Zhou Z; Chen Y; Yu Z; Wang D; Zhao C; Xu J; Song W; Li B; Shen J; Zhu X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3479-85. PubMed ID: 25227060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planning quality and delivery efficiency of sMLC delivered IMRT treatment of oropharyngeal cancers evaluated by RTOG H-0022 dosimetric criteria.
    Zhu XR; Schultz CJ; Gillin MT
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):80-95. PubMed ID: 15738923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies.
    Georg D; Kroupa B; Winkler P; Pötter R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1142-50. PubMed ID: 12852539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Cheng CW; Das IJ; Huq MS
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2959-68. PubMed ID: 14655943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of IMRT planning parameters on planning efficiency, delivery efficiency, and plan quality.
    Mittauer K; Lu B; Yan G; Kahler D; Gopal A; Amdur R; Liu C
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061704. PubMed ID: 23718583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An IMRT dose distribution study using commercial verification software.
    Liu G; Fernando W; Grace M; Rykers K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 27(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 15580842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the ArcCHECK QA system for IMRT and VMAT verification.
    Li G; Zhang Y; Jiang X; Bai S; Peng G; Wu K; Jiang Q
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 22583979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IMRT quality assurance using a second treatment planning system.
    Anjum MN; Parker W; Ruo R; Aldahlawi I; Afzal M
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 19944590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance analysis of a film dosimetric quality assurance procedure for IMRT with regard to the employment of quantitative evaluation methods.
    Winkler P; Zurl B; Guss H; Kindl P; Stuecklschweiger G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(4):643-54. PubMed ID: 15773625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions.
    Renner WD; Sarfaraz M; Earl MA; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 14655947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
    Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID.
    Warkentin B; Steciw S; Rathee S; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3143-55. PubMed ID: 14713081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric performance of an enhanced dose range radiographic film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance.
    Olch AJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2159-68. PubMed ID: 12349938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.