234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14528992)
21. Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations.
Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 14621243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in class I cavities: 5-year results.
Demircia M
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Dec; 9(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18265712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
Demirci M; Yildiz E; Uysal O
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.
Ernst CP; Canbek K; Aksogan K; Willershausen B
Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Sep; 7(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12898294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years.
Swift EJ; Perdigão J; Wilder AD; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1117-23. PubMed ID: 11575019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations.
Loguercio AD; Lorini E; Weiss RV; Tori AP; Picinatto CC; Ribeiro NR; Reis A
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17432402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Watson RE; Garvan C; Mjör IA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents.
Matis BA; Cochran MJ; Carlson TJ; Guba C; Eckert GJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 15127867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Hernandez PA; Macedo RP; Busato AL
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16457675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ten-year Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 26525008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Five-year clinical performance of the dentine deproteinization technique in non-carious cervical lesions.
Rocha Gomes Torres C; Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Pucci CR; Antunes MJ; de La Cruz DB; Borges AB
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 24739486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Six-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin.
Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Geraldeli S; Dutra HR; Masuda MS
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 11893050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
