227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14529213)
1. Monte Carlo study of TLD measurements in air cavities.
Haraldsson P; Knöös T; Nyström H; Engström P
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):N253-9. PubMed ID: 14529213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy.
Ding W; Johnston PN; Wong TP; Bubb IF
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):39-48. PubMed ID: 15462585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of out-of-field doses in radiotherapy treatments of paediatric patients using Monte Carlo methods and measurements.
Cravo Sá A; Barateiro A; Bednarz B; Borges C; Pereira J; Baptista M; Pereira M; Zarza-Moreno M; Almeida P; Vaz P; Madaleno T; Romanets Y
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():53-61. PubMed ID: 32088565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo dose verification of IMRT treated head and neck cancer patients.
Engström PE; Haraldsson P; Landberg T; Sand Hansen H; Aage Engelholm S; Nyström H
Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16165916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets.
Capote R; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2416-22. PubMed ID: 15487721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose calculation accuracy of lung planning with a commercial IMRT treatment planning system.
McDermott PN; He T; DeYoung A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(4):341-51. PubMed ID: 14604424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID.
Steciw S; Warkentin B; Rathee S; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):600-12. PubMed ID: 15789607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pencil beam approach for correcting the energy dependence artifact in film dosimetry for IMRT verification.
Kirov AS; Caravelli G; Palm A; Chui C; LoSasso T
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3690-9. PubMed ID: 17089835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a phantom to validate high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning systems with heterogeneous algorithms.
Moura ES; Micka JA; Hammer CG; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA; Rostelato ME; Zeituni CA
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1566-74. PubMed ID: 25832047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.
Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry audit of radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
Bulski W; Chełmiński K; Rostkowska J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):472-6. PubMed ID: 25848119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
Çatli S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
