180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14530679)
1. Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy.
Franklin EJ; Seetharam S; Lowney J; Horgan PG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Oct; 46(10):1380-3. PubMed ID: 14530679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized study.
Bessa SS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jun; 51(6):940-4. PubMed ID: 18273670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ligasure Precise vs. conventional diathermy for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Altomare DF; Milito G; Andreoli R; Arcanà F; Tricomi N; Salafia C; Segre D; Pecorella G; Pulvirenti d'Urso A; Cracco N; Giovanardi G; Romano G;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 May; 51(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 18231834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids.
Wang JY; Lu CY; Tsai HL; Chen FM; Huang CJ; Huang YS; Huang TJ; Hsieh JS
World J Surg; 2006 Mar; 30(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 16479346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids.
Nienhuijs S; de Hingh I
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jan; 2009(1):CD006761. PubMed ID: 19160300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.
Castellví J; Sueiras A; Espinosa J; Vallet J; Gil V; Pi F
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2009 Sep; 24(9):1011-8. PubMed ID: 19396451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy.
Kwok SY; Chung CC; Tsui KK; Li MK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):344-8. PubMed ID: 15616753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy--cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.
Ho YH; Cheong WK; Tsang C; Ho J; Eu KW; Tang CL; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 2000 Dec; 43(12):1666-75. PubMed ID: 11156449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Closed vs ligasure hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Pattana-Arun J; Sooriprasoet N; Sahakijrungruang C; Tantiphlachiva K; Rojanasakul A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Apr; 89(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 16696389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing pedicle ligation and pedicle coagulation.
Bessa SS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21979186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Sakr MF; Moussa MM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1161-7. PubMed ID: 20628280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and complications between diathermy and scissors for closed hemorrhoidectomy.
Ibrahim S; Tsang C; Lee YL; Eu KW; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Nov; 41(11):1418-20. PubMed ID: 9823809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ligasure, Harmonic Scalpel versus conventional diathermy in excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Talha A; Bessa S; Abdel Wahab M
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):252-256. PubMed ID: 25214362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy excision and diathermy coagulation for symptomatic, prolapsed hemorrhoids.
Quah HM; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Mar; 47(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 14991499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy.
Palazzo FF; Francis DL; Clifton MA
Br J Surg; 2002 Feb; 89(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 11856126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy.
Jayne DG; Botterill I; Ambrose NS; Brennan TG; Guillou PJ; O'Riordain DS
Br J Surg; 2002 Apr; 89(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 11952582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery.
Kraemer M; Parulava T; Roblick M; Duschka L; Müller-Lobeck H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Aug; 48(8):1517-22. PubMed ID: 15937619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation.
Andrews BT; Layer GT; Jackson BT; Nicholls RJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 1993 Jun; 36(6):580-3. PubMed ID: 8500376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up.
Cheetham MJ; Cohen CR; Kamm MA; Phillips RK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Apr; 46(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 12682543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure.
Chung YC; Wu HJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Jan; 46(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 12544527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
