These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14531220)

  • 41. Evaluation of laboratory instrumentation.
    Krauss EA
    Clin Lab Med; 1983 Sep; 3(3):425-42. PubMed ID: 6641111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An Internet-based external quality assessment in cytogenetics that audits a laboratory's analytical and interpretative performance.
    Hastings RJ; Maher EJ; Quellhorst-Pawley B; Howell RT
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Oct; 16(10):1217-24. PubMed ID: 18493265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. New quality guidelines for laboratories.
    Berte LM
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Mar; 32(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 10947452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The evolving LIS needs to be "everything" for today's laboratories.
    Clifford LJ
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Aug; 43(8):28. PubMed ID: 21936411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. IOM report on medical errors: CLMA members speak out.
    Monahan C
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 11392709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Designing quality control for neonatal screening assays.
    Suolinna EM; Torresani TE; Westgard JO
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():103-6. PubMed ID: 15906710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Information systems and human error in the lab.
    Bissell MG
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2004; 18(6):349-55. PubMed ID: 15597557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Responses to customer complaints at commercial laboratories].
    Honma M
    Rinsho Byori; 1997 Oct; 45(10):971-5. PubMed ID: 9369075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Designing and evaluating autoverification rules for thyroid function profiles and sex hormone tests.
    Li J; Cheng B; Ouyang H; Xiao T; Hu J; Cai Y
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 55(2):254-263. PubMed ID: 28490181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development and implementation of an LIS-based validation system for autoverification toward zero defects in the automated reporting of laboratory test results.
    Jin D; Wang Q; Peng D; Wang J; Li B; Cheng Y; Mo N; Deng X; Tao R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jun; 21(1):174. PubMed ID: 34078363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Monitoring the performance of mycobacteriology laboratories: a proposal for standardized indicators.
    McCarthy KD; Metchock B; Kanphukiew A; Monkongdee P; Sinthuwattanawibool C; Tasaneeyapan T; Rienthong S; Ngamlert K; Srisuwanvilai LO; Varma JK
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2008 Sep; 12(9):1015-20. PubMed ID: 18713498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention.
    Hollensead SC; Lockwood WB; Elin RJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 88(3):161-81. PubMed ID: 15562462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Current status of verification practices in clinical biochemistry in Spain.
    Gómez-Rioja R; Alvarez V; Ventura M; Alsina MJ; Barba N; Cortés M; Llopis MA; Martínez C; Ibarz M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1739-46. PubMed ID: 23612663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Using machine learning to develop an autoverification system in a clinical biochemistry laboratory.
    Wang H; Wang H; Zhang J; Li X; Sun C; Zhang Y
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 59(5):883-891. PubMed ID: 33554565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. From benchtop to desktop: creative forms for organizing and presenting laboratory data.
    Stanley L; Baron EJ
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1999 Sep; 31(9):42-3, 46, 48-50. PubMed ID: 10621383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Nested control procedures for internal analytical quality control. Theoretical design and practical evaluation.
    Aronsson T; Groth T
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1984; 172():51-64. PubMed ID: 6599530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A computer program for quality control in the blood gas laboratory.
    DeWitt AL
    Respir Care; 1984 Apr; 29(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 10315540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The quest to balance talent and technology.
    Robertson J
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2003 Nov; 35(11):30-1. PubMed ID: 14628642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory.
    Wang Z; Peng C; Kang H; Fan X; Mu R; Zhou L; He M; Qu B
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jul; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31269951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What works. Scanning the future. Scanning and workflow help a clinical lab access and process information in hours instead of days.
    Dowd B
    Health Manag Technol; 2002 Sep; 23(9):50, 53. PubMed ID: 12232904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.