181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14531316)
1. Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes.
Hser YI; Teruya C; Evans EA; Longshore D; Grella C; Farabee D
Eval Rev; 2003 Oct; 27(5):479-505. PubMed ID: 14531316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants.
Hser YI; Evans E; Teruya C; Huang D; Anglin MD
Eval Program Plann; 2007 May; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 17689324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement.
Hser YI; Teruya C; Brown AH; Huang D; Evans E; Anglin MD
Am J Public Health; 2007 Jan; 97(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 17138930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug treatment program compliance and resistance activities during implementation of California's Proposition 36.
Reynolds G
J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2009; 32(1):85-106. PubMed ID: 19558034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up.
Gossop M; Trakada K; Stewart D; Witton J
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Sep; 79(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 16102373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of methamphetamine precursor chemical legislation, a suppression policy, on the demand for drug treatment.
Cunningham JK; Liu LM
Soc Sci Med; 2008 Apr; 66(7):1463-73. PubMed ID: 18222587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Employment services utilization and outcomes among substance abusing offenders participating in California's proposition 36 drug treatment initiative.
Evans E; Hser YI; Huang D
J Behav Health Serv Res; 2010 Oct; 37(4):461-76. PubMed ID: 19688598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Workforce professionalism in drug treatment services: impact of California's Proposition 36.
Wu F; Hser YI
J Subst Abuse Treat; 2011 Jan; 40(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 21036513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of the effects of organization and financing on the utilization and costs of public mental health services in san diego county.
Gilmer T
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Sep; 10(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 17890829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders.
Evans E; Li L; Hser YI
J Subst Abuse Treat; 2008 Dec; 35(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 18514474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of drug treatment entry by Latino male injection drug users from different national/geographical backgrounds.
Reynoso-Vallejo H; Chassler D; Witas J; Lundgren LM
Eval Program Plann; 2008 Feb; 31(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 18222143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Substance use and treatment seeking in young offenders on community orders.
Lennings CJ; Kenny DT; Nelson P
J Subst Abuse Treat; 2006 Dec; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 17084797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of community substance abuse treatment services on clients' criminal arrests.
Ventura LA; Lambert EG
Addict Behav; 2005 Aug; 30(7):1459-63. PubMed ID: 16022942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Juvenile drug courts: emerging outcomes and key research issues.
Henggeler SW
Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2007 May; 20(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 17415076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in drop out, drug free discharge and rates of re-presentation: a retrospective cohort study of drug treatment clients in the North West of England.
Beynon CM; Bellis MA; McVeigh J
BMC Public Health; 2006 Aug; 6():205. PubMed ID: 16904004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of specialty substance abuse and mental health services in adults with substance use disorders in the community.
Mojtabai R
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Jun; 78(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 15893166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study.
Petry NM; Peirce JM; Stitzer ML; Blaine J; Roll JM; Cohen A; Obert J; Killeen T; Saladin ME; Cowell M; Kirby KC; Sterling R; Royer-Malvestuto C; Hamilton J; Booth RE; Macdonald M; Liebert M; Rader L; Burns R; DiMaria J; Copersino M; Stabile PQ; Kolodner K; Li R
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Oct; 62(10):1148-56. PubMed ID: 16203960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified TC for MICA offenders: crime outcomes.
Sacks S; Sacks JY; McKendrick K; Banks S; Stommel J
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(4):477-501. PubMed ID: 15282836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: 3-year self-report outcome study.
Gottfredson DC; Kearley BW; Najaka SS; Rocha CM
Eval Rev; 2005 Feb; 29(1):42-64. PubMed ID: 15604119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment for substance abuse in Australia: a comparison of public and private programs.
McNeese-Smith DK
Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res; 2003 Sep; 9(1):1025-38. PubMed ID: 14533233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
