These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14531591)
1. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results. Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Kanumilli P; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Amore R; Lewgoy HR; Cordeiro HJ; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 15973834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year. Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions. Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth. Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Abdalla AI; El Sayed HY Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 19024260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Aranha AC; Pimenta LA Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. van Dijken JW Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15241906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions. Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions. Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]