These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14531601)

  • 21. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials.
    Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The weight change of various light-cured restorative materials stored in water.
    Keyf F; Yalçin F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 15915206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
    Huth KC; Manhart J; Selbertinger A; Paschos E; Kaaden C; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques.
    Amaral CM; Peris AR; Ambrosano GM; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 15301209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage evaluation of two newly introduced hybrid glass ionomer cements.
    Chohayeb AA; Fatahi T; Henley GL
    NDA J; 1996; 47(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9594077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15986945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 14698768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 17207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Removal of amalgam, glass-ionomer cement and compomer restorations: changes in cavity dimensions and duration of the procedure.
    Szep S; Baum C; Alamouti C; Schmidt D; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 12413228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Resin-modified glass-ionomers in dentistry].
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):448-51. PubMed ID: 11921988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.