159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14532333)
1. Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerations.
Yang MC; Yang JJ; McIndoe RA; She JX
Physiol Genomics; 2003 Dec; 16(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 14532333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding sample size: what determines the required number of microarrays for an experiment?
Jørstad TS; Langaas M; Bones AM
Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Feb; 12(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 17229587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size calculations based on ranking and selection in microarray experiments.
Matsui S; Zeng S; Yamanaka T; Shaughnessy J
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 17680829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size determination in microarray experiments for class comparison and prognostic classification.
Dobbin K; Simon R
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 15618525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the identification of differentially expressed genes: improving the generalized F-statistics for Affymetrix microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 30(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 16979381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance testing for small microarray experiments.
Kooperberg C; Aragaki A; Strand AD; Olson JM
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2281-98. PubMed ID: 15889452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing differential gene expression with small sample sizes in oligonucleotide arrays using a mean-variance model.
Hu J; Wright FA
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17447928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A control study to evaluate a computer-based microarray experiment design recommendation system for gene-regulation pathways discovery.
Yoo C; Cooper GF; Schmidt M
J Biomed Inform; 2006 Apr; 39(2):126-46. PubMed ID: 16203178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting differentially expressed genes: minimizing burden of testing and maximizing number of discoveries.
Lee WC
Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 20(10):766-71. PubMed ID: 20579903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size calculation with dependence adjustment for FDR-control in microarray studies.
Shao Y; Tseng CH
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4219-37. PubMed ID: 17328091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Powers of multiple-testing procedures for identification of genes significantly differentially expressed in microarray experiments.
Tan YD; Yan HM
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 33(12):1132-40. PubMed ID: 17185174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient two-sample designs for microarray experiments with biological replications.
Landgrebe J; Bretz F; Brunner E
In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 15506995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing statistical precision, power, and robustness of alternative experimental designs for two color microarray platforms based on mixed effects models.
Tempelman RJ
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2005 May; 105(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 15808299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
