These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453258)

  • 1. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems.
    Hasanreĭsoğlu U; Sönmez H; Uçtaşli S; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 23(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 8850164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique.
    Milleding P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 1441934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent.
    Manso AG; González-Lopez S; Bolaños-Carmona V; Maurício PJ; Félix SA; Carvalho PA
    J Adhes Dent; 2011 Oct; 13(5):455-65. PubMed ID: 21246071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2277155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations.
    Kaplan I; Mincer HH; Harris EF; Cloyd JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 1403938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques.
    Liberman R; Ben-Amar A; Herteanu L; Judes H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9049916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of resin-based liner materials and condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Papathanasiou A; Perry R
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 14677616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Liner and light exposure: effect on in-vitro Class V microleakage.
    Svizero Nda R; D'Alpino PH; da Silva e Souza MH; de Carvalho RM
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 15986952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
    Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.