117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453298)
1. The prediction of fetal compromise and acidosis by biophysical profile scoring in the small for gestational age fetus.
Walkinshaw S; Cameron H; MacPhail S; Robson S
J Perinat Med; 1992; 20(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 1453298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens.
Baschat AA; Gembruch U; Harman CR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 11844191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of fetal acidaemia in intrauterine growth retardation: comparison of quantified fetal activity with biophysical profile score.
Ribbert LS; Nicolaides KH; Visser GH
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):653-6. PubMed ID: 8369249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between fetal biophysical assessment, umbilical artery velocimetry, and fetal acidosis.
Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; McLean DA; Fleming AD; Scorza WE
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Apr; 77(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 2002989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods.
Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a fetal risk assessment score for the prediction of neonatal outcome in the growth-restricted fetus.
Ott WJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1941-4. PubMed ID: 22489827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of morbidity in small and normally grown fetuses by fetal heart rate variability, biophysical profile score and umbilical artery Doppler studies.
Soothill PW; Ajayi RA; Campbell S; Nicolaides KH
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Aug; 100(8):742-5. PubMed ID: 8399012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified fetal biophysical profile in the assessment of perinatal outcome.
Habek D; Hodek B; Herman R; Maticević A; Jugović D; Habek JC; Salihagić A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Jul; 123(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 11534302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses.
DeVore GR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 26113227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH.
Manning FA; Snijders R; Harman CR; Nicolaides K; Menticoglou S; Morrison I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 169(4):755-63. PubMed ID: 8238129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationships among the fetal biophysical profile, umbilical cord pH, and Apgar scores.
Vintzileos AM; Gaffney SE; Salinger LM; Kontopoulos VG; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 157(3):627-31. PubMed ID: 3631164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal myocardial performance index in assessment and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus: a cohort and nested case-control study.
Henry A; Alphonse J; Tynan D; Welsh AW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 28345186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal hemodynamics, fetal biometry and Doppler indices in pregnancies followed up for suspected fetal growth restriction.
Roberts LA; Ling HZ; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH; Kametas NA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 52(4):507-514. PubMed ID: 29607557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity in the prediction of adverse outcome in near-term small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
Cavallaro A; Veglia M; Svirko E; Vannuccini S; Volpe G; Impey L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 52(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 29266519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Added value of umbilical vein flow as a predictor of perinatal outcome in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
Parra-Saavedra M; Crovetto F; Triunfo S; Savchev S; Parra G; Sanz M; Gratacos E; Figueras F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 23288780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
Valiño N; Giunta G; Gallo DM; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 26094952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
