These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453404)

  • 21. Obstetric performance, perinatal outcome and risk of infection to the newborn in spontaneous and artificial rupture of membranes during labour.
    Seneviratne HR; de Silva GD; de Silva MV; Rudra T
    Ceylon Med J; 1998 Mar; 43(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 9624837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intrauterine pressure wave characteristics of the upper and lower uterine segments in parturients with active-phase arrest.
    Margono F; Minkoff H; Chan E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 8459952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian Multicentre Postterm Pregnancy Trial.
    Goeree R; Hannah M; Hewson S
    CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(9):1445-50. PubMed ID: 7728693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A randomized comparison of 15- and 40-minute dosing protocols for labor augmentation and induction.
    Lazor LZ; Philipson EH; Ingardia CJ; Kobetitsch ES; Curry SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):1009-12. PubMed ID: 8233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.
    Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Lahav E; Horowitz E; Hod M; Kaplan B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Oct; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15358459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Induction of labor in great grandmultipara with misoprostol.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin HG; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16129547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Oxytocin-induced labor characteristics and uterine activity after preinduction cervical priming with prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel.
    Ferguson JE; Ueland FR; Stevenson DK; Ueland K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 72(5):739-45. PubMed ID: 3173925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
    Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Clinical study on induction of labor with feedback pulsatile oxytocin system].
    Li F; Liu C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Aug; 31(8):480-2. PubMed ID: 9275441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel.
    Nager CW; Key TC; Moore TR
    J Perinatol; 1987; 7(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 3504454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Silverberg D; Menes TS; Levy I; Katz M; Mazor M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1335-40. PubMed ID: 15167839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nipple stimulation for labor augmentation.
    Stein JL; Bardeguez AD; Verma UL; Tegani N
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Jul; 35(7):710-4. PubMed ID: 2198350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Infectious morbidity, operative blood loss, and length of the operative procedure after cesarean delivery by method of placental removal and site of uterine repair.
    Magann EF; Washburne JF; Harris RL; Bass JD; Duff WP; Morrison JC
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):517-20. PubMed ID: 7582225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A two-channel radiotelemetry system for clinical fetal monitoring.
    Neuman MR; O'Connor E
    Biotelem Patient Monit; 1980; 7(2):104-21. PubMed ID: 7417701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques.
    Cohen WR; Hayes-Gill B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 24684703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Fetal monitoring with a combination transducer for FHR and uterine contraction--production of the transducer].
    Maeda K; Nagata N
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 41(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 2926198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intrauterine pressure monitoring with a balloon-tipped catheter.
    Villanueva C; Sauvage JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Mar; 45(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 1113946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.