These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14534562)

  • 1. Flaws undermine results of UK biotech debate.
    Campbell S; Townsend E
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6958):559. PubMed ID: 14534562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agricultural biotech. U.K. probes public opposition to GM crops.
    Eastman Q
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1637-8. PubMed ID: 12805509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public debate.
    Pidgeon NF; Poortinga W; Rowe G; Jones TH; Walls J; O'Riordan T
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):467-79. PubMed ID: 15876218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agbiotech. U.K. government panel gives GM crops cautious support.
    Pickrell J
    Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):447-8. PubMed ID: 12881538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UK public opposes government on transgenic crops.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6956):331. PubMed ID: 14508445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Researchers protest at GM crop debate.
    Williams N
    Curr Biol; 2003 Dec; 13(23):R889-90. PubMed ID: 14654005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public input sought on transgenic farming.
    Tilstone C
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6941):672. PubMed ID: 12802294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which biotech foods are most acceptable to the public?
    Lusk JL; McFadden BR; Rickard BJ
    Biotechnol J; 2015 Jan; 10(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 25388815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetically modified food. TV drama sparks scientific backlash.
    Shouse B
    Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5575):1948-9. PubMed ID: 12065809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diversity in food technology.
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):473. PubMed ID: 12891314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debate, what debate?
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6941):669. PubMed ID: 12802292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejection of GM crops is not a failure for science.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):7. PubMed ID: 26333435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activists should accept mainstream view of GM.
    Dennis DT
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7042):561. PubMed ID: 15931192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].
    Nishiura H; Imai H; Nakao H; Tsukino H; Kuroda Y; Katoh T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12508467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.
    Lang JT; Hallman WK
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Battlefield: hitting the supporters of biotechnology.
    Katzek JA
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):875. PubMed ID: 19829352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom.
    Kirk SF; Greenwood D; Cade JE; Pearman AD
    Appetite; 2002 Jun; 38(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 12071684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Labeling of genetically modified food: closer to reality in the United States?
    Wohlers AE
    Politics Life Sci; 2013; 32(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 24047092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GM crops: a continent divided.
    Masood E
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):224-6. PubMed ID: 14628018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.