BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14535136)

  • 1. IOM cites core functions to improve EHR systems.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2003 Oct; 10(10):118-9. PubMed ID: 14535136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IOM committee on quality outlines its aims and 'rules' for health care.
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 2001 Apr; 19(4):23. PubMed ID: 11329973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data sharing on the horizon.
    Wagner L
    Provider; 2004 Jan; 30(1):20-4, 26-7, 30-1 passim. PubMed ID: 14733175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long march toward progress.
    Bergman R
    Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Sep; 67(18):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8369835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New institute shoots for the moon.
    Dunbar C
    Comput Healthc; 1991 Oct; 12(10):21. PubMed ID: 10115966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aspects of CPRs (computerized patient record) & organizational redesign.
    Ball M
    Healthc Inform; 1993 Jun; 10(6):28, 30. PubMed ID: 10126966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pocket full of change.
    Forbis P
    J Am Assoc Med Transcr; 1992; 11(6):10. PubMed ID: 10183746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting standards for computerized physician order entry.
    Patient Care Manag; 2003 Jul; 19(7):9. PubMed ID: 12854201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing recommendations from the IOM's quality chasm report.
    Staggers N
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 14971077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A vision for future patient records.
    Steen EB; Detmer DE
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 Sep; 62(9):48-54. PubMed ID: 10112936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Institute of Medicine report addresses privacy issues.
    Frawley KA
    J AHIMA; 1994 Apr; 65(4):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10133024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-based patient record assessment standards.
    Health Manag Technol; 1995 Feb; 16(2):80. PubMed ID: 10140458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-based patient records--hype versus reality.
    Tallon RW
    Nurs Manage; 1996 Mar; 27(3):53-6. PubMed ID: 8700496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explosive growth in CPRs: evaluation criteria needed.
    Dick R; Andrew W
    Healthc Inform; 1995 Feb; 12(2):110, 112, 114. PubMed ID: 10140917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The IOM New Health System and HIPAA: same sheet of music?
    Stetson NG
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11813526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information technology. Help is on the way.
    Rollins G
    Hosp Health Netw; 2003 Sep; 77(9):24-5. PubMed ID: 14528795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Institute of Medicine's patient record study and its implications for record administrators.
    Dick RS
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Jun; 11(4):67-72. PubMed ID: 10112039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The health of the computer-based patient record.
    Frisse ME
    Acad Med; 1992 Jul; 67(7):441-3. PubMed ID: 1616556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American Medical Record Association position statement. The computer-based record: an essential technology for healthcare.
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 Oct; 62(10):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10113923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The three Rs for CPR (computer-based patient record) implementation: regulations, reengineering & rightsizing.
    Melrose JP
    Healthc Inform; 1993 Oct; 10(10):58-60, 62, 64 passim. PubMed ID: 10129481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.