These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453692)

  • 1. The effect of hypnotically elicited testimony on jurors' judgments of guilt and innocence.
    Wagstaff GF; Vella M; Perfect T
    J Soc Psychol; 1992 Oct; 132(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 1453692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
    Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hypnosis with a criminal defendant and a crime witness: two recent related cases.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):266-82. PubMed ID: 2258244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What makes recovered-memory testimony compelling to jurors?
    Coleman BL; Stevens MJ; Reeder GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Aug; 25(4):317-38. PubMed ID: 11501437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
    Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: the Effect of Truncated Testimony on Juror Decision-making.
    Anderson L; Gross J; Sonne T; Zajac R; Hayne H
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):200-17. PubMed ID: 26879737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.
    Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rock v. Arkansas: hypnosis, the defendant's privilege.
    Orne MT; Dinges DF; Orne EC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):250-65. PubMed ID: 2258243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential jurors' opinions on the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness identification: a brief communication.
    Labelle L; Lamarche MC; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 2258247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The perceived guilt and innocence of adults with developmental language disorder and adults with typical language during a mock interrogation.
    Spaulding TJ; Blewitt A
    J Commun Disord; 2024; 110():106429. PubMed ID: 38754317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
    Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
    Giannelli PC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of forensic evidence for decisions on criminal guilt.
    Ling S; Kaplan J; Berryessa CM
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33736846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details.
    Bell BE; Loftus EF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 May; 56(5):669-79. PubMed ID: 2724064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.