These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1453692)

  • 21. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prejudice and terror management at trial: Effects of defendant race/ethnicity and mortality salience on mock-jurors' verdict judgments.
    Leippe MR; Bergold AN; Eisenstadt D
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):279-294. PubMed ID: 27136391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. I spy with my little eye: jurors' detection of internal validity threats in expert evidence.
    McAuliff BD; Duckworth TD
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Dec; 34(6):489-500. PubMed ID: 20162342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
    Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The admissibility of hypnotically enhanced testimony. Have the courts been mesmerized?
    Henderson MD
    J Leg Med; 1985 Sep; 6(3):293-335. PubMed ID: 3877135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
    Cooper J; Hall J
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
    Wuensch KL; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Constitutional rights and hypnotically elicited testimony.
    Newman AW; Thompson JW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 10212035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How jurors use and misuse character evidence.
    Hunt JS; Budesheim TL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):347-61. PubMed ID: 15065980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
    Plumm KM; Terrance CA
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
    Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When does evidence of eyewitness confidence inflation affect judgments in a criminal trial?
    Bradfield A; McQuiston DE
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Aug; 28(4):369-87. PubMed ID: 15499821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: the impact of task complexity.
    Bodenhausen GV; Lichtenstein M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 May; 52(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 3585699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence.
    Mitchell G; Garrett BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.